Product Knowledge and Lifecycle Management in Project-Based Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Changes taking place in project-based manufacturing emphasize the importance of agile manufacturing, product knowledge management and product lifecycle information. The paper describes dependencies between product definition and production strategy covering also other potential areas of research i.e. growth of industrial service business and development of manufacturing and supply networks. As an outcome it can be argued that more research is needed to align product lifecycle management in project-based manufacturing, as well as to cover the evolving information needs of internal and external stakeholders. Due to the increase of industrial services, also services should be included as a part of product definition; the extended product description introduces a new set of requirements that need to be taken into account as a part of product and production strategy definition.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1283-1287

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Meier, R. Roy and G. Seliger, Industrial Product-Service Systems—IPS2. CIRP Ann, Manuf. Technol. 59 (2010) 607–627.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.004

Google Scholar

[2] J. Noonan and M. Wallace, Building responsive contract manufacturers through value-focused strategies, Supply Chain Management: Int. J. 9 (2004) 295-302.

DOI: 10.1108/13598540410550046

Google Scholar

[3] H. Gebauer, E. Fleisch and T. Friedli, Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies, European Manage. J. 23 (2005) 14–26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.006

Google Scholar

[4] R. Oliva and R. Kallenberg, Managing the transition from products to services, Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage. 14 (2003) 160-172.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Wise and P. Baumgartner, Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing, Harvard Business Review, September-October, (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Vargo and R. Lusch, Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, J. Market. 68 (2004) 1–17.

Google Scholar

[7] BestServ Feasibility Report, Technology Industries of Finland, Savion Kirjapaino Oy, Kerava, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] X. Yang, G. Shi and Z. Zhang, Collaboration of large equipment complete service under cloud manufacturing mode, Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014) 326–336.

DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.825383

Google Scholar

[9] M. Rudberg and J. Olhager, Manufacturing networks and supplychains: an operations strategy perspective, Omega, The Int. J. Manage. Sci. 31 (2003) 29-39.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(02)00063-4

Google Scholar

[10] M. Karkkainen, T. Ala-Risku and K. Framling, The product centric approach: a solution to supply network information management problems?, Comput. Ind. 52 (2003) 147–159.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3615(03)00086-1

Google Scholar

[11] J.C. Aurich, C. Fuchs and C. Wagenknecht, Life cycle oriented design of technical Product-Service Systems, J. Cleaner Prod. 14 (2006) 1480-1494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.019

Google Scholar

[12] I. Ruohomäki, J-P. Anttila and A. Heikkilä, To better production strategy decisions, in Finnish, Teknologiainfo Teknova, Finland, (2011).

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Koren, The Global Manufacturing Revolution, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] A. McKay, M.S. Bloor and A. de Pennington, A Framework for Product Data, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 8 (1996) 825-838.

DOI: 10.1109/69.542033

Google Scholar

[15] V. Rueckel, A. Koch, K. Feldmann and H. Meerkamm, Process Data Management for the Shortening of the Whole Product Creation Process, Comput. Supported Coop. Work in Design II, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 3865 (2006) 616-625.

DOI: 10.1007/11686699_62

Google Scholar

[16] SFS-EN ISO 10303-210 : en: Industrial automation systems and integration. Product data representation and exchange. Part 210: Application protocol: Electronic assembly, interconnection, and packaging design (ISO 10303-210: 2001). European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2003).

DOI: 10.3403/02688277

Google Scholar

[17] J. Stark, Product Lifecycle Management – 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, Springer-Verlag, USA, (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-546-0

Google Scholar

[18] T. Kemppainen, H. Kropsu-Vehkaperä and H. Haapasalo, Introduction Product Data Ownership Network, University of Oulu: Research Reports in Department of Industrial Engineering and Management 1/2011, (2011).

Google Scholar

[19] J. Miltenburg, Setting manufacturing strategy for factory-within-a-factory, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113 (2008) 307-323.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.001

Google Scholar

[20] A. Saaksvuori and A. Immonen, Product Lifecycle Management, Springer-Verlag, Germany, (2002).

Google Scholar