The Influence of NaOH Concentration on Molar Ratios of Palm Oil Boiler Ash Based Geopolymer

Article Preview

Abstract:

Palm oil boiler ash (BA) has been synthesis with alkaline activator to produce boiler ash based geopolymer. The ratio of BA/alkaline activator and Na2SiO3/NaOH was fixed for the entire experiment, where six different of NaOH concentration (6 M, 8 M, 10 M, 12 M, 14 M, 16 M) was used to produce geopolymer paste. The compressive strength of geopolymer paste with NaOH concentration 14 M showed the maximum strength which is 13.9 MPa. The strength reduce when geopolymer paste used NaOH concentration more than 14 M. In term of molar oxides SiO2/Al2O3 , Na2O/SiO2 and H2O/Na2O with the increasing of NaOH concentration Na2O/SiO2 ratio also increased but H2O/Na2O ratio decreased. Meanwhile SiO2/Al2O3 ratio remain constant because the BA/alkaline activator and Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio were constant in this study. The XRD analysis illustrated that the value of 2θ for all geopolymer samples were approximately the same which is 27° with major components of quartz and minor component of cristobalite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

245-250

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Davidovits: Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 2nd Edition, Saint Quentin, France, Geopolymer Institute (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Criado, A. Fernandez-Jimenez and A. Palomo: Micropor Mesopor Mat, Vol 106 (2007), pp.180-191.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Palomo, M.W. Grutzeck and M.T. Blanco: Cem and Conc Res, Vol 29 (1999), pp.1323-1329.

Google Scholar

[4] J.L. Provis, P. Duxson, G.C. Lukey and J.S.J. van Deventer: Modeling the formation of geopolymers. Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] U. Rattanasak and P. Chindaprasirt: Miner Eng, Vol. 22 (2009), pp.1073-1078.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Khale and R. Chaudhary: Journal of Mater. Sci., Vol. 42 (2007), pp.729-746.

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Ariffin, M. Hussin, M. Warid and M.A. Rafique Bhutta: Adv. Mater. Res., Vol. 339 (2011), pp.452-457.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Chub-uppakarn, N. Thaenlek and R. Thaisiam: Proceedings: Pure and Applied Chemistry International Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, (2011), pp.347-350.

Google Scholar

[9] M.A. Salih, A.A. Abang Ali and N. Farzadnia: Adv. in Env. Bio., Vol. 7(12) (2013), pp.3572-3579.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Panias, I.P. Giannopoulou and T. Perraki: Coll. Surf. A, Vol. 201 (2007), pp.246-254.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Guo, H. Shi and W.A. Dick: Cem. Conc. Comp., Vol. 32 (2010), pp.142-147.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.M. Liew, H. Kamarudin, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C.M. Ruzaidi and C.Y. Heah: Constr. Build Mater., Vol. 30 (2012), pp.794-802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.079

Google Scholar

[13] J. Davidovits (2006). H2O, SiO2 and Al2O3 ratios. http: / www. geopolymer. org.

Google Scholar

[14] Y.M. Liew, H. Kamarudin, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C.M. Ruzaidi and C.Y. Heah: Constr. Build Mater., Vol. 37 (2012), pp.440-451.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.075

Google Scholar

[15] M.A. Megat Johari, A.M. Zeyad, N. Muhamad Bunnori and K.S. Ariffin: Constr. Build Mater., Vol. 30 (2012), pp.281-288.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.007

Google Scholar

[16] A. Hawa, D. Tonnayopas and W. Prachasaree: The Scientific World Journal, (2013), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[17] P. Duxson, A. Fernandez-Jimenez, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, A. Palomo and J.S.J. van Deventer: Journal of Mater. Sci., Vol. 42 (2007), pp.2917-2933.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

Google Scholar