Effect of Alkaline Activator Ratio to Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete with Trass as Filler

Puput Risdanareni; Januarty Jaya Ekaputri; Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.754-755.406

Paper Titles

Hydration Kinetics and Strength Development of Waste Paper Sludge Ash (WPSA) with Different Particle Size as Binary Blended Cement
p.382

New Concrete with Recycled Aggregates from Leftover Concrete
p.389

Blended Cement Containing High Volume Ground Dune Sand and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag for Autoclave Concrete Industry
p.395

The Influence of Chloride Environment on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash Using Taguchi Approach
p.400

Effect of Alkaline Activator Ratio to Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete with Trass as Filler
p.406

Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Alum Sludge Aggregate Concrete
p.413

Workability and Compressive Strength of Recycled Concrete Waste Aggregate Concrete
p.417

Influence of Thermally Activated Alum Sludge Ash on the near Surface Characteristics of Multiple-Blended Binders Concretes
p.421

The Behaviour of Rubber Tyre as Fine Aggregate in Concrete Mix
p.427

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 754-755Effect of Alkaline Activator Ratio to Mechanical...

Effect of Alkaline Activator Ratio to Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete with Trass as Filler

Abstract:

This paper describes the effect of alkaline activator ratio (Na₂SiO₃/NaOH) to mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. The mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete were assessed by setting time, split tensile strength and porosity. Fly ash was used as a cement substitute, and trass used as filler. While, Natrium hydroxide (NaOH) and Sodium Silicate (Na₂SiO₃) was applied as alkaline activator. In this study, NaOH concentration eight and ten molar with an alkaline activator ratio Na₂SiO₃/ NaOH by mass: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 were used. The test result showed that setting time, porosity and split tensile strength of geopolymer concrete were hardly influenced by NaOH concentration and the alkaline activator ratio. The alkaline activator ratio of Na₂SiO₃/NaOH has an optimum value at 2 and 2.5. Test result showed that the fastest setting time was 25 minute, the highest amount of closed porosity was 9.035 % and the highest split tensile strength was 2.86 MPa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials Engineering and Technology III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 754-755)

Pages:

406-412

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.754-755.406

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2015

Authors:

Puput Risdanareni*, Januarty Jaya Ekaputri, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah

Keywords:

Concentration of NaOH, Fly Ash, Geopolymer Concrete, Na₂SiO₃/NaO, Porosity, Setting Time, Split Tensile Strength, Trass

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] C. A Hendriks, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Interlaken, Austria, Aug. 30–Sept. 2, IEA GHG R&D Programme, UK( 1998).

Google Scholar

[2] Davidovits, J, Journal of Thermal Analysis (1991).

Google Scholar

[3] Davidovits, J, Proceeding First International Conference on Alkali Cement and Concrete, (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] Ellis Gartner, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (2004) 1489–1498.

Google Scholar

[5] Ekaputri, J. J, Triwulan dan Damayanti O., Jurnal PONDASI, vol 13 no 2 hal. 124-139 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Ekaputri, J. J, Triwulan, Jurnal Teknik Sipil ITB Vol 20 No. 1 (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] Habert, G., d'Espinose de Lacaillerie, J.B., Roussel, N, Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 1229–1238 (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] Hardjito, D., Wallah S.E., and Rangan B.V., Civil Engineering Dimension, Vol. 6, No. 2, p.88–93 (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] Risdanareni, Puput, Ekaputri,J. J, Triwulan, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil X-2014 (2014).

Google Scholar

[10] SN Fifinatasha , Advances in Environmental Biology, 7(12) October Special Issue 2013, Pages: 3835-3842 (2013).

Google Scholar

[11] Van Jaarsveld, J.G.S., J.S.J. van Deventer, G.C. Lukey, Materials Letters, 57(7): 1272-1280 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(02)00971-0

Google Scholar

[12] Valeria F.F. Barbosa, Kenneth J.D. MacKenzie , Clelio Thaumaturgo, International Journal of Inorganic Materials 2 (2000) 309–317.

Google Scholar