Materials Ranking by Means of Multi Attribute Decision Making

Article Preview

Abstract:

The first part of the work shortly describes possible mathematical methods for decision making. The paper gives an overview with general comments on multi-criteria problems, related to the preferences and the priorities of the decision-makers. The paper proposed and solves an example for material rating by a multiple attribute decision making. The MADM and PCA methodologies have been applied to rank out ten alternatives. Similar materials were selected using both techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

135-140

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Opricovic, G. -H. Tzeng, The Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European J. of Op. Research 156(2) (2004) 445-455.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1

Google Scholar

[2] S.D. Pohekar , M. Ramachandran, Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 (2004) 365–381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007

Google Scholar

[3] C. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making: method and application, Springer Publications, Berlin, (1981).

Google Scholar

[4] J. M. Lafleur, Probabilistic AHP and TOPSIS for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making under Uncertainty, IEEEAC paper #1135, V. 2, (2011) 1-18.

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2011.5747655

Google Scholar

[5] K. S. Raju, D. N. Kumar, Multi criterion decision making in irrigation planning, Agr. Sys., 62 (1999) 117-129.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Zhaoxu, M. Han, Multi-criteria decision making method based on Improved ELECTRE III model, International Conference on Education Technology and Management Science (ICETMS), Atlantis Press (2013) 548-550.

DOI: 10.2991/icetms.2013.306

Google Scholar

[7] S. Opricovic, G. -H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods, European Journal of Operational Research, V. 178, No 2 (2007) 514–529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020

Google Scholar

[8] C. Târcolea, A. S. Paris, P. Voicu, Principal Component Analysis Applied to Agricultural Equipments, Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi (Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science) Istanbul 7 (3) (2011) 305-308.

Google Scholar

[9] A. S. Paris, C. Târcolea, PCA Applied for Equipments Selection, Int. Conf. on Manuf. Sci. and Educ. - MSE 2011- Sibiu-Romania Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education- MSE 2011 vol. I Creative Thinking in Engineering and Academic Education, June 2-5, Ed. Univ. L. Blaga Sibiu ( 2011) 349-352.

Google Scholar

[10] A. S. Paris, C. Târcolea, Computer aided selection in design processes with multivariate statistics, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Manuf. Sys., ICMaS, Bucharest, Vol. 4, (2009) 335-338.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Târcolea, A. S. Paris, The Joreskog technique applied for materials design, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Manufacturing Systems – ICMaS, nov. 2008, Ed Acad. Romane, Bucharest, Romania, (2008) 309-312.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Târcolea, A. S. Paris, Discriminant Analysis and Applied Regression, The International Conference of Differential Geometry and Dynamical BSG PROCEEDINGS 18, (DGDS-2010) August 2010, Bucharest, Geometry Balkan Press, (2011) 221-226.

Google Scholar

[13] M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Third Edition, Ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] C. Târcolea, A. S. Paris, A. Demetrescu –Târcolea, Statistical methods applied for materials selection The International Conference DGDS-2008 & MENP-5, 2008, Mangalia, Romania, Applied Sciences, Geometry Balkan Press, Vol. 11, (2009) 145-150.

Google Scholar

[15] A. S. Paris, S. Ionescu, P. Szel, C. Târcolea, Statistical approach in the selection of materials for engineering products, Sci. Sem. Modern mechanical design, Ed. U. P. B., (1991), 97-106.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Singh, R. Kumar, Selection of Material for Bicycle Chain in Indian Scenario using MADM Approach, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, V. III , London, (2012) 1377-1381.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Cantrell, Bicycle materials case study, Information on http: /depts. washington. edu /matseed/ mse_resources/ Webpage/Bicycle/Bicycle%20Materials%20Case%20Study. htm.

Google Scholar

[18] A.S. Paris, Statistik Anwendungen in Ingenieurwissenschaften - eine starke Innovationsunterstützung, Interdisciplinary approach of innovation as a progress factor, Int. Scientific Conf. Bucharest, Romania, Dec. 2012, FILS, UPB, Ed. Printech, (2012).

Google Scholar

[19] P. Thokala, A. Duenas, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment, Value in Health, V. 15, Is. 8 (2012) 1172-1181.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015

Google Scholar

[20] Y. Peng, Y. Zhang, G. Kou, Y. Shi, A Multi criteria Decision Making Approach for Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set, PLoS ONE, v. 7, is. 7 (2012) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041713

Google Scholar