Measurement of Air Traffic Control Students Proportion Depending on their Attitude to Risk at 10-km. Flight Norms Violation

Article Preview

Abstract:

According to ICAO SHELL [1] model air traffic control (ATC) process may be described as complex structure. This structure involves human operator work that brings in the human factor problems. Those problems are caused by the psycho-physiological properties of human and require special treatment. Many efforts are applied to increase human stress resistance, improve working procedures and others. However one of the topics that are paid less attention is ATC operators personal attitude to risks. To determine ATC risk attitude it is important to work both with experienced operators and with ATC students to compare results and analyze them in dynamics.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

146-149

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ICAO, 2009, Safety Management Manual Doc 9859 AN/474, ICAO Montreal, Canada, 251 pages.

Google Scholar

[2] ICAO, 2009, Airtrafficmanagement: Procedures for Air navigation servicesDoc 4444 AТМ/501, ICAOMontreal, Canada, 251 pages.

Google Scholar

[3] Keeney R.L., Raiffa H., 1993, Decisions with multiple objectives–preferences and value tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge & New York, 569 pages.

DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830390206

Google Scholar

[4] Reliability and efficiency in engineering: Handbook: in 10 volumes. – V. 3. Efficiency of technical systems / under general editorship of V.F. Utkin, Y.V. Kryuchkov. – M.: Maschinostroenie, 1988. – 328 pages.

Google Scholar

[5] Reva О.М., Shmelyova T.F. 1998, Paradox of air traffic controller activity psychological dominant during stochastic risk. Problems of aircrafts air-navigation systems development, (Air navigation and avionics – 98): materials of international scientific conference, К.: KIUCA, page 135.

Google Scholar

[6] Reva, О.М., Muhtarov P.S., Korj S.І., Nedbay S.V. 2012, Algorythmization of aviation oprator attitude to risk definition procedure. (Aviation-space devices and technology: sci. -tech. magazine,H.: National airspace university named afer M.E. Jukovsky «HAI»)№ 1 (88), pages 109-114.

Google Scholar

[7] Reva, A.N., Muhtarov P.S., Nedbay S.V. 2012, Theoretical model of aviation operator main activities dominant determination during risky conditions. Elmiməcmuələr: Jurnal Milli Aviasiya Akademiya sinin, Baku, Oktyabr-Dekabr., № 4., pages 64-73.

Google Scholar

[8] Reva О.М., Muhtarov P.S., Mirzoev B.M., Vdovichenko V.V., Nasirov S.S. 2014, Dynamics of main decision taking dominance of air traffic controller during activities conditions complications. Modern information and innovation technologies on transport (MINNT - 2014): materials of VI international scientific practical conference., dedicated to 180-years of Herson state sea academy foundation. Herson, 27-29 may 2014, Herson: HDMA, pages 86-89.

Google Scholar

[9] Kozeletskiy Y., 1979, Psychological theory of solutions: translated from polish. G.Е. Mintz, V.N. Porus; editorship B.V. Biryukova, М.: Progress, 504 pages.

Google Scholar

[10] Kamisin V.V., Reva O.M., 2012, Methods of system analysis in qualimetry of educational-upbringing process: monograph. К.: Informational systems, 270 pages.

Google Scholar