Compensating for Creep Effects in One-Indent Nanoindentation Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Detailed observations of nanoindentation static creep effects exhibited in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is presented and discussed in this study. One-indent nanoindentation technique, the partial unloading measurement (PUM) method, is compared with the basic measurement BM method (i.e., an array of multiple single indents with various magnitudes). The experimental results for PMMA reveal a strong dependence on the loading conditions. It was found that the PUM results for PMMA are not consistent with the corresponding BM results due to significant static. The creep depths accumulated and increased the indentation depth, and thus the contact area. The hardness and elastic modulus evaluated from these experimental results decreased with the indentation depth (or load).The effect of static creep exhibited in polymers for the PUM method during the determination of mechanical properties was studied. A significant static creep effect was found for polymers when the indentation load was held in order to attenuate the rapid direction change between the loading and unloading segments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

28-31

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments, J. Mater. Res. 7(4) (1992), pp.1564-1583.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.1564

Google Scholar

[2] M. Sakai: Energy Principle Of The Indentation Induced Inelastic Surface Deformation And Hardness Of Brittle Materials, Acta Mater. 41(6) (1993), pp.1751-1758.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90194-w

Google Scholar

[3] S. Suresh, A.E. Giannakopoulos: Determination of Elastoplastic Properties by Sharp Indentation, Scripta Mater. 40(10) (1999) pp.1191-1198.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(99)00011-1

Google Scholar

[4] B. Taljat, T. Zacharia and F. Kosel: New Analytical Procedure to Determine Stress-Strain Curve from Spherical Indentation Data, International J. Solids Struct. 35(33) (1998), pp.4411-4426.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(97)00249-7

Google Scholar

[5] J.S. Field, M.V. Swain: A Simple Predictive Model for Spherical Indentation, J. Mater. Res. 8(2) (1993), pp.297-306.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1993.0297

Google Scholar

[6] B. N. Lucas, W. C. Oliver and J. E. Swindman: The Dynamics of Frequency-Specific, Depth-sensing Indentation Testing, MRS Symp. Proc. 522 (1998), pp.3-14.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-522-3

Google Scholar

[7] A.C. Fischer-Cripps, in: Nanoindentation, Springer, New York (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] T.F. Page, G.M. Pharr, J.C. Hay, W.C. Oliver, B.N. Lucas, E. Herbert and L. Riester: Nanoindentation Characterization of Coated Systems: P/S2 - A New Approach Using the Continuous Stiffness Technique, MRS Symp. Proc. 522 (1998), pp.53-64.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-522-53

Google Scholar

[9] A.K. Bhattacharya, W.D. Nix: Finite element simulation of Indentation Experiments, Int. J. Solids Struct. 24(12) (1998), pp.1287-1298.

Google Scholar

[10] P.J. Burnett, T.F. Page: Changing the surface mechanical properties of silicon by ion implantation, J. Mat. Res. 19 (1984), pp.845-860.

Google Scholar

[11] P.J. Burnett, D.S. Rickerby: The mechanical properties of wear-resistance coatings I: Modeling of hardness behaviour, Thin Solid Films 148 (1987), pp.41-50.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(87)90119-2

Google Scholar

[12] P.J. Burnett, D. S Rickerby: The mechanical properties of wear-resistance coatings II: Experimental studies and interpretation of hardness, Thin Solid Films 148 (1987), pp.51-65.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(87)90120-9

Google Scholar

[13] S.J. Bull, D.S. Rickerby: Evaluation of coatings, Bri. Ceram. Trans. J. 88 (1989), pp.177-183.

Google Scholar

[14] B.D. Fabes, W.C. Oliver, R.A. McKee and F.J. Walker: The determination of film hardness from the composite response of film and substrate to nanometer scale indentations, J. Mat. Res. 7(11) (1992), pp.3056-3064.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.3056

Google Scholar

[15] N.G. Chechenin, J. Bottiger and J.P. Krog: Nanoindentation of amorphous aluminum oxide films I. The influence of the substrate on the plastic properties, Thin Solid Films 261 (1995), pp.219-227.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(94)06490-3

Google Scholar

[16] P.J. Wei, J.F. Lin: A new method developed to evaluate both the hardness and elastic modulus of a coating-substrate system, Surf. Coat. Tech. 200 (2005), pp.2489-2496.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.09.013

Google Scholar

[17] I.N. Sneddon: The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3 (1965), pp.47-57.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4

Google Scholar

[18] A.H.W. Nagn, B. Tang: Viscoelastic effects during unloading in depth -sensing indentation, J. Mater. Res. 17(10) (2002), pp.2604-2610.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2002.0377

Google Scholar

[19] M. L. Oyen, R. F. Cook: Load-displacement behavior during sharp indentation of viscous-elastic-plastic materials, J. Mater. Res. 18(1) (2003), pp.139-150.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2003.0020

Google Scholar

[20] Y. W. Zhang, S. Yang: Analysis of nanoindentation creep for polymeric materials, J. Appl. Phys. 95(7) (2004), pp.3655-3666.

Google Scholar