Design Optimization of Spur and Helical Gear Pairs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Gears are the most common of machine elements and due to that many studies have been conducted on optimum gear design. Gear optimization can be divided into two categories, namely, single gear pair or Gear train optimization. The problem of gear pairs design optimization is difficult to solve because it involves multiple objectives and large number of variables. Hence a trustworthy and resilient optimization technique will be more useful in obtaining an optimal solution for the problems. In the proposed work an effort has been made to optimize spur and helical gear pair design using LINGO and Meta heuristics algorithms like Real Coded Genetic Algorithm (RCGA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).On applying the combined objective function factors like Power, Efficiency is maximized and the overall Weight, Centre distance has been minimized in the model. The performance of the proposed algorithms is validated through test problems and the comparative results are reported.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1034-1043

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Keywords:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Carrol, R.K.; Johnson, G.E. (1984). Optimal design of compact spur gear sets. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and automation in design, Vol. 106, 95-101.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3258568

Google Scholar

[2] Savage, M.; Lattime S.B.; Kimmel J.A. (1994). Optimal Design of Compact Spur Gear Reductions, Transactions of the ASME, 690 / Vol. 116. 690-696.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2919437

Google Scholar

[3] Deb, K.; Jain, S. (2003). Multi-Speed Gearbox Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. Journal of Mechanical design, Vol. 125. 609-619.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1596242

Google Scholar

[4] Tsay, C-B.; Tseng, C-H. (1997). Modified Helical Gear Train, Journal of Mechanical Design. Vol. 119. 307-314.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2826252

Google Scholar

[5] } Prayoonrat,S.; Walton,D. (1988). Practical approach to optimum gear train design, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK, Vol. 20. 83-92.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-4485(88)90053-x

Google Scholar

[6] Yoon K.Y.; Rao S.S. (1996). Dynamic Load Analysis of Spur Gears Using a New Tooth Profile, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 118 . 1-6.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2826851

Google Scholar

[7] Innocenti.C. (1996). A Framework for Efficiency Evaluation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Gear Trains, Transactions of the ASME, 556 / Vol. 118. 556-560.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2826928

Google Scholar

[8] Rosic,B. (2002). Multicriterion optimization of multistage gear train transmission, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 8, 1107-1115.

Google Scholar

[9] Abersek,B.; Flasker,J.; Balic.J. (1996). Expert system for designing and manufacturing of a Gearbox, Expert systems with applications, Vol. 11(3). 397-405.

Google Scholar

[10] Ramamurthi,V.; Gautam,P.; Kothari, A. (1997). Computer-aided design of a two-stage gearbox Technical note. Advances in Engineering Software. Vol. 28. 73-82.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-9978(96)00042-7

Google Scholar

[11] Marcelin, J. L. (2001). Genetic optimization of gears. International Journal of Advanced Manufaturing Technology. Vol. 17(12). 910-915.

Google Scholar

[12] Marcelin ,J. L. (2004). A meta model using neural networks and Genetic Algorithms for an Integrated Optimal design of mechanism. International, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol. 24. 708-714.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1750-7

Google Scholar

[13] Rao,S. S. (1984). Optimization Theory and applications, Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

[14] Jain, P.; Agogino, A.M. (1990). Theory of design: An optimization perspective. Mech. Mach. Theory. 25 (3). 287-303.

Google Scholar

[15] Rao, S. S.; Eslampour, H.R. (1986). Multi stage multi objective optimization of gear boxes. Journal of mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design. Vol. 108. 461- 468.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3258755

Google Scholar

[16] Kennady,J.; Eberhart, R.C. (2001) Swarm intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann.

Google Scholar

[17] Dudley D.W. (1954) Practical Gear Design, McGraw –Hill Book Co, New York.

Google Scholar

[18] Design Data Book, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore-641004, Tamilnadu , India.

DOI: 10.18831/james.in/2015021004

Google Scholar

[19] Ho,Y.C.; Moodie, C,L. (1998) Machine Layout with a linear Single-Row Flow Path in an Automated Manufacturing System Journal of Manufacturing Systems. Vol 17. 1 – 22.

DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6125(98)80006-x

Google Scholar

[20] Saravanan,R.; Sachithanandam, M. (2001) Genetic Algorithm for multi variable surface grinding process optimization using a multi objective function model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol 17. 330 - 338.

DOI: 10.1007/s001700170167

Google Scholar

[21] Baskar, N.; Asokan, P.; Saravanan, R.; Prabhakaran,G. (2005). Optimization of machining parameters for milling operations using non-conventional methods, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Vol. 25. 1078-1088.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1939-9

Google Scholar

[22] Asokan, P.; Saravanan, R.; Vijayakumar, K. (2003).

Google Scholar

[23] Kennedy,J.; Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization procedures. International conference on neural networks. Australia IEEE. 1942-(1948).

Google Scholar

[24] Vijayakumar,K.;, Prabhaharan,G.; Asokan, p,; Saravanan,R. (2003). Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using ant colony system International Journal Of Machine Tool & Manufacture. Vol. 43. 1633-1639.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00081-6

Google Scholar