Surface Tension Effect on Sound Absorption Characteristics of a Cavity-Backed Semi-Permeable Membrane

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes the analysis on the characteristics of semi-permeable membrane sound absorber. The effects of membrane surface tension on the sound absorption characteristics were investigated. The characteristics of the membrane absorber was measured experimentally in terms of Sound Absorption Coefficient, α and Noise Reduction Coefficient, NRC. The membrane is made of thin, flexible, semi-permeable latex material and the tests were carried out by using impedance tube method according to ISO 10534-2 standard. The results showed that the surface tension has significant influence on the sound absorption characteristics. For the parameters used in the laboratory work, specimen with unstretched surface tension has the best absorption performance.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Kinsler (2000), Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th Edition, New York: John Wiley.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Mohrova and K. Kalinova (2012), Different Structures of PVA Nanofibrous Membrane for Sound Absorption Application, Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, pg. 1-4.

DOI: 10.1155/2012/643043

Google Scholar

[3] X. -L. Gai, X. -H. Li, B. Zhang, P. Xie and Z. -H. Ma (2013).

Google Scholar

[4] I. Bosman, W. Lauriks, G. Lombaert, J. Mermans and G. Vermeir (1999), Sound Absorption of Stretched Ceilings with an Impervious Synthetic Membrane, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 106, issue 1, pg. 233-239.

DOI: 10.1121/1.427052

Google Scholar

[5] K. Sakagami, M. Kiyama, M. Morimoto and D. Takahashi (1996), Sound Absorption of a Cavity-Backed Membrane: A step Towards Design Method for Membrane-Type Absorbers, Applied Acoustics, vol. 49, no. 3, pg. 237-247.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(96)00025-4

Google Scholar

[6] J.S. Bolton and J. Song (2003), Sound Absorption Characteristics of Membrane-Based Sound Absorbers, Publications of the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University.

Google Scholar

[7] W.A. Thomas and C.J. Hurst (1976), Acoustic Performance of a Stretched Membrane and Porous Blanket Combination, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 59, no. 5, pg. 1071-1076.

DOI: 10.1121/1.380972

Google Scholar

[8] W. Frommhold, H.V. Fuchs and S. Sheng (1994), Acoustic Performance of Membrane Absorbers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 170, issue 5, pg. 621-636.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1091

Google Scholar

[19] K. Sakagami, T. Nakamori, M. Morimoto and M. Yairi (2011), Absorption Characteristics of a Space Absorber using a Microperforated Panel and a Permeable Membrane, Acoust. Sci. & Tech., vol. 32, no. 1, pg. 47-49.

DOI: 10.1250/ast.32.47

Google Scholar

[10] K. Sakagami, Y. Fukutani, M. Yairi and M. Marimoto (2014), Sound Absorption Characteristics of a Double-Leaf Structure with an MPP and a Permeable Membrane, Applied Acoustics, vol. 76, pg. 28-34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.07.025

Google Scholar

[11] K. Sakagami, Y. Fukutani, M. Yairi and M. Marimoto (2014), A Theoretical Study on the Effect of a Permeable Membrane in the Air Cavity of a Double-Leaf Microperforated Panel Space Sound Absorber, Applied Acoustics, vol. 79, pg. 104-109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.12.015

Google Scholar

[12] M.H. Zainulabidin, M.H. Abdul Rani, N. Nezere and A.L. Mohd Tobi (2014), Optimum Sound Absorption by Materials Fraction Combination, International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pg. 118-121.

Google Scholar