Conceptual Model of Contractor Satisfaction in the Industrialized Building System (IBS) Implementation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most construction projects have been recognized as underperformance due to the increase numbers of delays, cost overruns and poor quality construction. The inability of contractors to meet clients’ expectation has been found as one of the main causes that contribute to the project failure. Alternatively, key players are encouraged to shift from the conventional method towards Industrialized Building System (IBS). Also known as prefabrication, previous researchers proved that IBS is able to minimize on-site works and increase the building quality in a controlled environment. However, the take up rate of IBS in Malaysian construction industry is still low as compared to developed countries basically due to incapability of contractors in mastering an advanced technology and their negative perceptions in IBS implementation. In addition, a limited subjective performance measurement, particularly to evaluate contractors' satisfaction level in implementing the IBS construction is still neglected. This is a review paper for an on-going research in examining contractor satisfaction levels on the IBS implementation and its attributes. The measurements are based on contractor perception instead of the typical approaches that solely concerned with objective measures (time, cost and quality). As a result, several attributes that integrate sustainability elements (economical, environmental, social, and institutional factors) are also determined. These attributes are then developed through systematic analysis to enhance the ability of IBS in improving contractors’ satisfaction. The developed framework is expected to help the project team in performing IBS projects more efficiently, ensuring the quality meet the standards and encouraging effective communication between participants. Moreover, the findings will be useful to assist contractors in enhancing competitiveness, increase company reputation and improve project deliveries to meet global challenges.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yang, J., Editorial: Promoting integrated development for smart and sustainable built environment. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2012. 1(1).

DOI: 10.1108/20466091211227025

Google Scholar

[2] Kamar, K.A.M., Z.A. Hamid., M.K. Ghani., A.H.A. Rahim., M.A.M. Zain. and F. Ambon., Business Strategy of Large Contractors in Adopting Industrialised Building System (IBS): The Malaysia Case. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2012. 7(6): pp.774-784.

DOI: 10.1109/beiac.2012.6226077

Google Scholar

[3] Xiong, B., M. Skitmore., B. Xia., M.A. Masrom., K. Ye. and A. Bridge., Examining the influence of participant performance factors on contractor satisfaction: A structural equation model. International Journal of Project Management, 2014. 32(3): pp.482-491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.003

Google Scholar

[4] Masrom, M.D.A., M. Skitmore, and A. Bridge, Determinants of contractor satisfaction. Construction Management and Economics, 2013. 31(7): pp.761-779.

DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.814919

Google Scholar

[5] Kärnä, S., V.M. Sorvala, and J.M. Junnonen, Classifying and clustering construction projects by customer satisfaction. Facilities, 2009. 27(9-10): pp.387-398.

DOI: 10.1108/02632770910969621

Google Scholar

[6] Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), Manual for IBS Contect Scoring System (IBS SCORE). 2010, Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[7] Yunus, R. and J. Yang, Improving ecological performance of industrialized building systems in Malaysia. Construction Management and Economics, 2014. 32(1-2): pp.183-195.

DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.825373

Google Scholar

[8] Blismas, N., C. Pasquire, and A. Gibb, Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2006. 24(2): pp.121-130.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190500184444

Google Scholar

[9] Tam, C.M., V.W.Y. Tam., J.K.W. Chan. and W.C.Y. Ng., Use of prefabrication to minimize construction waste—a case study approach. International Journal of Construction Management & Economics, 2005. 5(1): p.91–101.

DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2005.10773069

Google Scholar

[10] Yunus, R. and J. Yang, Critical sustainability factors in industrialised building systems. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 2012. 12(4): pp.447-463.

DOI: 10.1108/14714171211272216

Google Scholar

[11] Abd Hamid, Z., K.A.M. Kamar., M.Z.M. Zain., M.K. Ghani. and A.H.A. Rahim., Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Malaysia: The Current State and R&D Initiatives Malaysian Construction Research Journal (MCRJ), 2008. 1(2): pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[12] Gibb, A.G.F., Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research. Construction Management and Economics, 2001. 19(3): pp.307-315.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190010020435

Google Scholar

[13] Leung, M.Y., S.T. Ng, and S.O. Cheung, Measuring construction project participant satisfaction. Construction Management and Economics, 2004. 22(3): pp.319-331.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190320000000000

Google Scholar

[14] Chan, A.P.C. and D.W.M. Chan, Developing a benchmark model for project construction time performance in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 2004. 39(3): pp.339-349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.08.012

Google Scholar

[15] Ahmed, S.M. and R. Kangari, Analysis of client-satisfaction factors in construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 1995. 11(2): pp.36-44.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(1995)11:2(36)

Google Scholar

[16] Cavana, R.Y., B.L. Delahaye, and U. Sekaran, Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. 2001, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

[17] Blismas, N., C. Pasquire, and A. Gibb, Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2006. 24(2): pp.121-130.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190500184444

Google Scholar

[18] Chen, Y., G.E. Okudan, and D.R. Riley, Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in Construction, 2010. 19(2): pp.235-244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004

Google Scholar

[19] Jaillon, L. and C.S. Poon, Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study. Construction Management and Economics, 2008. 26(9): pp.953-966.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190802259043

Google Scholar

[20] Luo, Y., R. Riley., M.J. Horman. and G.O. Kremer., Decision Support Methodology for Prefabrication Decisions on Green Building Projects. in Symposium on Sustainability and Value Through Construction Procurement. 2008. University of Salford: University of Salford.

Google Scholar

[21] Nelms, C.E., A.D. Russell, and B.J. Lence, Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies: a framework and its application. Building Research & Information, 2007. 35(3): pp.237-251.

DOI: 10.1080/09613210601058139

Google Scholar

[22] Soetanto, R. and D.G. Proverbs, Modelling the satisfaction of contractors: the impact of client performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2002. 9(5/6): pp.453-465.

DOI: 10.1108/eb021239

Google Scholar

[23] Jaillon, L., C.S. Poon, and Y.H. Chiang, Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 2009. 29(1): pp.309-320.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015

Google Scholar

[24] Abdul Rahman, H., C. Wang., L.C. Wood. and S.F. Lowa., Negative impact induced by foreign workers: Evidence in Malaysian construction sector. Habitat International, 2012. 36: pp.433-443.

DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.03.002

Google Scholar

[25] Jaillon, L. and C.S. Poon, Design issues of using prefabrication in Hong Kong building construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2010. 28(10): pp.1025-1042.

DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2010.498481

Google Scholar

[26] Carrillo, E.F.P., Corporate Governance: Shareholders' interests' and other stakeholders' interest. Corporate Ownership & Control, 2007. 4(4): pp.96-102.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2302532

Google Scholar