Feed Formulation under Raw Material and Production Costs Consideration

Abstract:

In this paper, the problem of animal feed formulation is addressed. A feed product is comprised of various kinds of raw ingredients. Traditionally, the least cost formulation (LCF) approach is used in the feed industry to determine the optimal blend of the feed ingredients based on nutritional requirements and raw material costs. LCF, however, does not consider the production cost. In practice, a wide variety of raw ingredients may require different levels of production load. For example, feed ingredients with high amount of fiber content may reduce the pelleting production rate, leading to high production cost. The main focus of this study is the development of a mathematical model to find an optimal blend of the feed ingredients with an objective to minimize the overall cost consisting of raw material cost, production cost, and opportunity cost. Multiple linear regression equations are used to estimate the production rate that depends on the fat and the fiber contents in the feed mix and the durability index of the feed pellet. The results indicated that the proposed method is more beneficial than traditional LCF and applicable to the feed industry.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 781)
• Pages: 667-670
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.781.667
• Online since: August 2015
• Authors: Mongkon Ittiphalin, Thawee Nakrachata-Amon, Supachai Pathumnakul*
• Keywords: Feed Ingredient, Least Cost Formulation, Mathematical Models

References

[1] J.R. Stokes, P.R. Tozer, Optimal feed mill blending, Rev. Agr. Econ. 28 (4) (2006) 543–552.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00321.x

[2] W.G.M.M. Rutten, J.W.M. Bertrand, Balancing stocks, flexible recipe costs and high service level requirements in a batch process industry: a study of a small scale model, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 110 (1998) 626–642.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00307-x

[3] G. Brigham, A classroom example of linear programming, Oper. Res. 7 (4) (1959) 524–533.

[4] G.M. Mohr, The bulk constraint and computer formulations of least-cost feed mixes, Rev. Marketing Agr. Econ. 40 (1) (1972) 15–28.

[5] S. Pathumnakul, M. Ittiphalin, K. Piewthongngam, S. Rujikietkumjorn, Should feed mills go beyond traditional least cost formulation?, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 75 (2011) 243–249.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.11.009

[6] M. Thomas, T. van Vliet, A.F.B. van de Poel, Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 3. Contribution of feedstuff components, Animal Feed Science Technology. 70 (1998) 59-78.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00072-2

[7] M. Ittiphalin, B. Arnonkijpanich, S. Pathumnakul, An artificial intelligence model to estimate the fat addition ratio for the mixing process in the animal feed industry, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10. 1007/s10845-014-0972-x (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0972-x