Discovering Product Innovation Potential within Existing Product Architectures

Article Preview

Abstract:

New and innovative products are drivers for successful and sustainable growth of companies. Only a continuous stream of innovations can defend established market segments and create new markets for the company. Especially for European companies, innovations offer the opportunity for differentiation against competitors and therewith help to consist the present cost pressure mainly coming from Asian countries. Thereby, innovation inherent risks regarding limited product success, longer development times and quality lacks threaten the success of the innovation process. With this paper, a new approach is introduced, which aims at the reduction of the risks in the innovation processes. This is realized by shifting the focus from a customer requirement driven innovation screening to a product portfolio based innovation approach. The idea is to identify innovation opportunities within existing portfolios to maximize the use of existing company capabilities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

540-546

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Innovation Excellence Study 2005, A.D. Little, Editor. (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Edison, H., N. bin Ali, and R. Torkar, Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 2013. 86(5): pp.1390-1407.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.013

Google Scholar

[3] Muller, A., L. Välikangas, and P. Merlyn, Metrics for innovation: guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. Strategy & Leadership, 2005. 33(1): pp.37-45.

DOI: 10.1108/10878570510572590

Google Scholar

[4] Danneels, E. and E.J. Kleinschmidt, Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001. 18(6): pp.357-373.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1860357

Google Scholar

[5] Albers, S. and O. Gassmann, Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement, in Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement, S. Albers, Editor. 2005, Gabler: Wiesbaden. pp.3-22.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_1

Google Scholar

[6] Crawford, M. and A. Di Benedetto, The Menu, in New Products Management, M. Crawford and A. Di Benedetto, Editors. 2008, McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York. pp.5-22.

Google Scholar

[7] Christensen, C.M., S. Cook, and T. Hall, MARKETING MALPRACTICE. Harvard Business Review, 2005. 83(12): pp.74-83.

Google Scholar

[8] Suh, N.P., Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems. Research in Engineering Design, 1998. 10: pp.189-209.

Google Scholar

[9] Abu-Assab, S., Quality Function Deployment in New Product Development, in Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into Quality Function Deployment, S. Abu-Assab, Editor. 2011, Springer: Cottbus.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8349-7075-6_4

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang, L.L., Identifying mapping relationships between functions and technologies with association rule mining. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2012. 25(6): pp.496-508.

DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2011.637962

Google Scholar

[11] ElMaraghy, H. and T. AlGeddawy, Co-evolution of products and manufacturing capabilities and application in auto-parts assembly. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2012. 24(2): pp.142-170.

DOI: 10.1007/s10696-011-9088-1

Google Scholar

[12] AlGeddawy, T., Co-Evolution in Manufacturing Systems Inspired by Biological Analogy. 2011, University of Windsor: Windsor.

Google Scholar

[13] AlGeddawy, T. and H. ElMaraghy, Nature Inspired Co-evolution in the Manufacturing World of Artefacts. 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV2011), 2011: pp.203-208.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_33

Google Scholar

[14] Schuh, G., Produktkomplexität managen. 2. ed. 2005, München: Carl Hanser.

Google Scholar

[15] Adams, R., Perceptions of Innovations: Exploring and Developing Innovation Classification, in School of Management. 2003, Cranfield University: Cranfield.

Google Scholar

[16] Venkatachalam, B., et al., Untangling Tanglegrams: Comparing Trees by Their Drawings. Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2010. 7(4): pp.588-597.

DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2010.57

Google Scholar

[17] AlGeddawy, T. and H. ElMaraghy, A Co-Evolution Model for Prediction and Synthesis of New Products and Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2012. 134(5): pp.051008-12.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4006439

Google Scholar

[18] AlGeddawy, T. and H. ElMaraghy, Optimum granularity level of modular product design architecture. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2013. 62: pp.151-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.118

Google Scholar