Subsurface Characterization Using Ground and Underwater Resistivity Techniques for Groundwater Abstraction

Article Preview

Abstract:

A geophysical method was used in studying the subsurface profile for investigating the aquifer existence at Jenderam Hilir, Selangor, Malaysia. The 2-D electrical resistivity technique is to determine the presence of aquifer suitable for groundwater abstraction. Resistivity was measured through an ABEM SAS 4000 Terrameter and ABEM Terrameter LS. 2-D electrical-imaging resistivity data of subsurface profile for each survey line were calculated inverse modelling, validate by borehole data which showed the lithology: sandy clay to sandy silt sediments more than 3 m deep, composed of alternating layers of silty and sand. The aquifer potential are mostly in silty sand zones which resistivity value should be within 60-800 ohm-m. Based on interpretation, a potential water-bearing aquifer was located at a depth of 3 m and below which is good agreement with interpreted results. 2-D underwater resistivity survey lines were conducted across the ground and river. Resistivity image was interpreted as silty sand under the river bed, which the subsurface aquifer on land has a physical contact with surface water. Result has shown that ground and underwater resistivity technique can be used as alternative method in finding a good location for groundwater abstraction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

629-633

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jiarong, L. and Lingjie, R., 2014. The Development of Deep Borehole Permanent-magnet Motor Direct Drive Top-Driving Drilling Rig. Procedia Engineering, 73(0): 143-149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.182

Google Scholar

[2] Loke, W.K., Yoon, S.F. and Zheng, H.Q., 2001. Selective-area epitaxial growth of GaAs in deep dielectric windows using molecular beam epitaxy. Journal of Crystal Growth, 222(1–2): 44-52.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(00)00896-4

Google Scholar

[3] Loke, M.H., Wilkinson, P.B. and Chambers, J.E., 2010. Fast computation of optimized electrode arrays for 2D resistivity surveys. Computers & Geosciences, 36(11): 1414-1426.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.016

Google Scholar

[4] Seger, M., Guerin, R., Frison, A., Bourennane, H., Richard, G., and Cousin, I., 2014. A 3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey To Characterise The Structure Of A Albeluvic Tonguing Horizon Composed Of Distinct Elementary Pedological Volumes. Geoderma 219-220. Pp 168-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.018

Google Scholar

[5] Baharuddin, M. F. T., Hashim, R., & Taib, S., 2009. Electrical imaging resistivity study at the coastal area of Sungai Besar, Selangor, Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(16), 2897-2906.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.2897.2906

Google Scholar

[6] Gobbett D.J., Hutchison C.S., 1973. Geology of the Malay Peninsular—West Malaysia and Singapore. Regional Geology Series. Wiley, New York, p 438p.

Google Scholar

[7] Keller, G.V. and Frischknecht, F.C., 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting.

Google Scholar

[8] Griffiths D.H., and Barker R.D., 1993. Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29, 211-226.

DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(93)90005-j

Google Scholar

[9] Saad, R., Nawawi, M. N. M., and Mohamad, E. T., 2012. Groundwater Detection in Alluvium Using 2-D Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT). Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 17, 369-376.

Google Scholar