Motivations and Limitations of Prefabricated Building: An Overview

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on previous studies, prefabricated building usage motivations in the construction sector differ over time and vary from country to country. To adopt this technology, awareness on current trends and the latest innovations should be increased by reviewing previous studies. The objective of this study is to conduct a revision of common motivations and limitations of prefabricated building in the construction industry taking into consideration the experience gained and reported by several countries. Results show that the adaptation of prefabricated building mainly depends on factors such as labor shortage, labor cost, housing demand, building process efficiency, weather, as well as reduction of waste material and energy consumption. Prefabricated building has a relatively low uptake in construction industries worldwide despite its inherent economic, environmental, and social benefits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

668-675

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Bruce, H. Sandbank, A history of Prefabrication. John B. Pierce Foundation, New York, (1943). http: /babel. hathitrust. org/cgi/pt?id=mdp. 39015006327772; view=1up; seq=9.

Google Scholar

[2] A. I. Akubue, Technology Transfer: A Third World Perspective. Journal of Technology Studies. 28 (1) (2002) 14-21.

Google Scholar

[3] CII. Preliminary research on prefabrication, preassembly, modularization and offsite fabrication in construction. Research Report 171-11, A Report to the Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Song, W. R. Fagerlund, C. T. Haas, C. B. Tatum and J. A. Vanegas, Considering prework on industrial projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (2005) 723-733.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:6(723)

Google Scholar

[5] Egan, Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force, Department of Transport and the Regions (DETR), UK, London, (1998).

Google Scholar

[6] Construction 21 Review Committee., Reinventing Construction. Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of National Development, Singapore, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] CIRC., Construction Industry Review Committee (CIRC), HKSAR Government, Jan. 2001, Hong Kong.

Google Scholar

[8] CIDB. Industrialized Building System (IBS) Roadmap 2003-2010. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), Kuala Lumpur, (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] K. Hampson, P. Brandon, Construction 2020: A vision for Australia's Property and Construction Industry, Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation for Icon. Net Pty Ltd., Brisbane, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Green, M. Kumaraswamy and G. Ofori, All Change in Construction: A Comparative Analysis of Construction Industry Reform in the UK, Hong Kong and Singapore., HYPERLINK (2011).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Badir, M. R. A. Kadir and A. H. Hashim. Industrialized Building Systems Construction in Malaysia" J. of Arch. Eng. 8 (1) (2002) 119-23.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Zutshi, A. Creed, An international review of environmental initiatives in the construction sector. Journal of Cleaner Production xxx. (2014) 1-15.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Goodier, A. Gibb, Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Construction Management and Economics. 25 (2007) 585-595.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190601071821

Google Scholar

[14] CII., Prefabrication and Preassembly Trends and Effects on the Construction Workforce,. Report No. 14. Center for Construction Industry Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, (2000).

Google Scholar

[15] W. Pan, A. R. J. Dainty and A. G. F. Gibb, Managing innovation: a focus on off-site production (osp) in the UK housebuilding industry. In: Khosrowshahi, F (Ed. ), 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Heriot Watt University. Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 2 (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] Lu Na, Investigation of the desginers' and general contrators' Perceptions of offsite construction techniques In the united states construction industry. (2007).

Google Scholar

[17] A. Gibb, M. Pendlebury. Build offsite – promoting construction offsite: glossary of terms'. Version 1. 2 Build Offsite June 2005, UK.

Google Scholar

[18] K. R. Uttam, R. Madhumita, and S. Subir, Mass-industrialized housing to combat consistent housing shortage in developing countries: Towards an appropriate system for india. Proc. World Congress on Housing, National Housing Programs - New Visions, November 03-07(2008).

Google Scholar

[19] Anders Segerstedt, Thomas Olofsson, Supply chains in the construction industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 15 (5) (2010) p.347 – 353.

DOI: 10.1108/13598541011068260

Google Scholar

[20] M. Santiago, A. Jardon, Building industrialization: Robotized assembly of modular products. Assembly Automation. 28 (2) (2008) 134–142.

DOI: 10.1108/01445150810863716

Google Scholar

[21] N. Blismas, R. Wakefield. Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation. 9 (1) (2009) pp.72-83.

DOI: 10.1108/14714170910931552

Google Scholar

[22] M. Arif, D. Bendi, A. Sawhney and K. C. Iyer, State of offsite construction in India-Drivers and barriers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 364 (2012) 012109.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/364/1/012109

Google Scholar

[23] Hani Aburas, Off-Site Construction in Saudi Arabia: The Way Forward. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 17 (2011) 122-124.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000048

Google Scholar

[24] C. L. Pasquire, G. E. Connolly, Leaner construction through off-site manufacturing. Proceedings IGLC, Gramado, Brazil. (2002) p.263–266.

Google Scholar

[25] L. Jaillon, C. S. Poon, The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector. Automation in Construction. 18 (2009) 239–248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.002

Google Scholar

[26] D. M. Gann, Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction Management and Economics. 14 (5) (1996).

DOI: 10.1080/014461996373304

Google Scholar

[27] J. Barlow, P. Childerhouse, D. Gann and S. Hong-Minh, Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Build. Res. Inf. 312 (2003) 134–145.

DOI: 10.1080/09613210302003

Google Scholar

[28] E. Duc, P. J. Forsythe and K. Orr, Is there really a case for Off-Site Manufacturing?. The 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2014).

DOI: 10.22260/isarc2014/0032

Google Scholar

[29] Wafaa Nadim Jack S. Goulding., Offsite production: a model for building down barriers, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2011, Vol. 18 Iss 1 p.82 – 101.

DOI: 10.1108/09699981111098702

Google Scholar

[30] Emel Laptali Orala., Gulgun M-st-koglu., and Ercan Erdis., JIT in developing countries—a case study of the Turkish prefabrication sector. Building and Environment. 38 (2003) 853 – 860.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00021-0

Google Scholar

[31] CIMP, The Construction Industry Master Plan 2006-2015: Malaysian Construction Industry, (2006).

Google Scholar

[32] N. A. Bari, N. A. Yusuff, N. Ismail and A. Jaapar A, Environmental Awareness and Benefits of Industrialized Building Systems (IBS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 50 (2012) 392 – 404.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.044

Google Scholar

[33] L. Clarke, C. Wall, Craft versus industry: the division of labour in European housing construction. Construction Management & Economics. 18 (6) (2000) 689-698.

DOI: 10.1080/014461900414745

Google Scholar

[34] B. Wouter, J. N. Klaas, Energy requirements of household consumption: a case study of The Netherlands. Ecological Economics. 28 (1999) 367–383.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00113-x

Google Scholar

[35] L. Jaillon, C. S. Poon and Y. H. Chiang, Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Management. 29 (2009) 309–320.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015

Google Scholar

[36] A. A. E. Othman, S. M. Conrads, Investigating the Feasibility of Industrialised Low-Cost Housing in South Africa. Open Building Manufacturing: Key Technologies, Applications, and Industrial Cases. ManuBuild. (2009) 105-127.

Google Scholar

[37] X. Xu, Y. Zhao, Some Economic Facts of the Prefabricated Housing. Industry Report, Rutgers Business School, Newark, NJ, (2010).

Google Scholar

[38] YEMAR Report. Turkish construction sector report, Istanbul, Yemar, (2006).

Google Scholar

[39] Wafaa Nadim Jack S. Goulding,. Offsite production: a model for building down barriers, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 18 (1) (2011) p.82 – 101.

DOI: 10.1108/09699981111098702

Google Scholar

[40] N. Lu, The Current Use of Offsite Construction Techniques in the United States Construction Industry. Construction Research Congress, (2009) pp.946-955.

DOI: 10.1061/41020(339)96

Google Scholar

[41] Gul Polat, Factors Affecting the Use of Precast Concrete Systems in the United States. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (2008) 169-178.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2008)134:3(169)

Google Scholar

[42] C. Ying, E. O. Gül and R. R. David, Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings . Automation in Construction. 19 (2010) 235–244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004

Google Scholar

[43] W. Pan, A. G. F. Gibb and A. R. J. Dainty, Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Construction Management and Economics. 25 (2) (2007) pp.183-194.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190600827058

Google Scholar

[44] C. Goodier, A. Gibb, The value of the UK market for offsite, Buildoffsite: promoting construction offsite, (2005). www. buildoffsite. co. uk.

Google Scholar

[45] L. Jaillon L, C. S. Poon, The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector. Automation in Construction. 18 (2009) 239–248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.002

Google Scholar

[46] V. W. Tam, C. M. Tam, S. X. Zeng and W. C. Ng, Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building and Environment. 42 (2007) 3642–3654.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003

Google Scholar

[47] IBS Roadmap Review, IBS Centre, Construction Industry Development Board, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, (2007).

Google Scholar

[48] M. N. Nawi, A. Lee and K. M. Nor, Barriers to Implementation of the Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Malaysia. The Built & Human Environment Review. 4 (2011).

Google Scholar

[49] Nick Blismas Ron Wakefield, Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia, Construction Innovation. 9 (1) (2009), p.72 – 83.

DOI: 10.1108/14714170910931552

Google Scholar