Effect of Surface Preparation and Passivation Treatment on Surface Topography of Ti6Al4V for Dental Implants

Article Preview

Abstract:

The major goal of our research work is to develop an effective and efficient procedure to prepare surfaces with an average surface roughness Ra of 1...2,5 μm and a proper surface topography, as the morphology of dental implant surface is of extreme importance in the process of implant osseointegration. The aim of present research was to elucidate the effect of surface preparation and passivation treatment on topography of Ti6Al4V surfaces for dental implants, and to perform an efficient procedure, in terms of process time. Thirty samples were prepared, some samples were subjected to sand blasting, all samples were acid etched using a dual bath of H2SO4 1n and HCl 1n (1:1) at different temperatures (60°C, 80°C, and 100°C) using different process durations (1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h). After acid etching procedure some samples were passivated in 30% HNO3 at room temperature, for 15 min. Scanning electron microscopy was performed in order to characterize the topography of the surfaces. We found that sand blasting and passivation treatment promotes the formation of a proper surface topography with large, smooth valleys (∼50 μm), different size large peaks (∼30 μm), and micropores (<10 μm) opened on the surface of valleys and peaks, required by a good osseointegration. We showed that the same proper morphology can be achieved by acid etching at different temperatures, using different process duration. The most efficient procedure takes place at 100°C, with process times of 1...3 hours.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

513-518

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Devilliers, M.T. Dinh, E. Mahe,D. Krulic, N. Larabi, N. Fatouros, Behaviour of titanium in sulphuric acid, application to DSAs, J. New. Mat. Electrochem. Systems. 9 (2006) 221-232.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, Effect of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 4 (2009) 172-184.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x

Google Scholar

[3] A.M. Ballo, O. Omar, W. Xia, A. Palmquist, Dental implant surfaces – psysicochemical properties, biological performance and trends, in Implant dentistry – a rapidly evolving practice, InTech (2011) 19-56.

DOI: 10.5772/17512

Google Scholar

[4] C.N. Elias, Factors affecting the success of dental implants, in Implant dentistry – a rapidly evolving practice, InTech (2011) 319-364.

DOI: 10.5772/18746

Google Scholar

[5] X. Liu , P.K. Chu, C. Ding, Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications, Materials Science and Engineering. 47 (2004) 49–121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001

Google Scholar

[6] A. Bagno, M. Dettin, G. Santoro, Characterization of Ti and Ti6Al4V surfaces after mechanical and chemical treatments: a rational approach to the design of biomedical devices, J. Biotechnol. Biomater. 2, 7 (2012) 151-157.

DOI: 10.4172/2155-952x.1000151

Google Scholar

[7] H. Garg, G. Bedi, A. Garg, Implant surface modifications: a review, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 6, 2 (2012) 319-324.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Ramazanoglu, Y. Oshida, Osseointegration and bioscience of implant surfaces – current concepts at bone-implant interface, in Implant dentistry – a rapidly evolving practice, InTech (2011) 57-82.

DOI: 10.5772/16936

Google Scholar

[9] T. Albrektsson, L. Sennerby, A. Wennerberg, State of the art of oral implants, Periodontology. 47 (2008) 15-26.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00247.x

Google Scholar

[10] T. Albrektsson, A. Wennerberg, The impact of oral implants – past and future, 1966-2042, Journal of Canadian Dental Association. 71, 5 (2005) 327-332.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Anil, P.S. Anand, H. Alghamdi, J.A. Jansen, Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration, in Implant dentistry – a rapidly evolving practice, InTech (2011) 83-108.

DOI: 10.5772/16475

Google Scholar

[12] A. Wennerberg, T. Albrektsson, Implant surfaces beyond micron roughness. Experimental and clinical knowledge of surface topography and surface chemistry, International dentistry. 8, 6 (2006) 14-18.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Wennerberg, S. Galli, T. Albrektsson, Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLAactive surface, Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 3 (2011) 59-67.

DOI: 10.2147/ccide.s15949

Google Scholar

[14] M.B. Rosa, T. Albrektsson, C.E. Francischone, H.O. Schwartz Filho, A. Wennerberg, The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern, J. Appl. Oral Sci. (2012) 550-554.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500010

Google Scholar

[15] G. Juodzbalys, M. Sapragoniene, A. Wennerberg, New acid etched titanium dental implant surface, Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and maxillofacial Journal. 5 (2003) 101-105.

Google Scholar

[16] C.Y. Guo, J.P. Matinlinna, A.T. Hong Tang, Effects of surface charges on dental implants: past, present, and future, International Journal of Biomaterials, ID 381535, (2012).

DOI: 10.1155/2012/381535

Google Scholar

[17] Feng Zhang, Chun-Fei Zhang, Mei-nv Yin, Ling-Fei Ren, Hai-sheng Lin, Geng-sheng Shi, Effect of heat treatment on H2O2/HCl etched pure titanium dental implant: An in vitro study, Med. Sci. Monit. 18 7 (2012) 265-272.

DOI: 10.12659/msm.883204

Google Scholar

[18] G. Strnad, N. Chirila, Corrosion rate of sand blasted and acid etched Ti6Al4V for dental implants, Procedia Technology. 19 (2015) 909 – 915.

DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.130

Google Scholar