Safety Evaluation of EC2 and MC 2010 Models for Assessment of Punching Resistance of Footings

Ján Hanzel; Lucia Majtánová; Jaroslav Halvonik

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.821.703

Paper Titles

Sensitivity of Acoustic Resonance Properties to a Change in Volume of Piriform Sinuses
p.671

Simple Model of the Cajal-Like Interstitial Cell and its Analysis
p.677

Finite Element Analysis of Fixation System Influence on the Thoracolumbar Spine Stability
p.685

Numerical Simulation of Interaction of Fluid Flow and Elastic Structure Modelling Vocal Fold
p.693

Safety Evaluation of EC2 and MC 2010 Models for Assessment of Punching Resistance of Footings
p.703

Load Carrying Capacity of Steel Arch Reinforcement Taking into Account the Geometrical and Physical Nonlinearity
p.709

Application of the DOProC Method in Solving Reliability Problems
p.717

Probabilistic Nonlinear Analysis of Bubble Tower Structure due to Extreme Pressure and Temperature
p.725

Steel Arch Stabilized by a Textile Membrane
p.733

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 821Safety Evaluation of EC2 and MC 2010 Models for...

Safety Evaluation of EC2 and MC 2010 Models for Assessment of Punching Resistance of Footings

Abstract:

Model for assessment of punching resistance in Eurocode 2 has been taken over from Model Code 1990. The model is fully empirical and was developed in 70s based on the experimental results obtained on flat slab specimens mainly loaded under axis-symmetric conditions. Therefore some doubts are soaring about applicability of the model for assessment of slab members exposed to the different conditions. Spread footings and foundation slabs represent such members. Growing number of experiments carried out on the footings last two decades allowed us to check safety of current model and compare it with the safety of the new models e.g. mechanical model based on the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) published in Model Code 2010 or amendments of EC2 model proposed by German group.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 821)

Pages:

703-708

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.821.703

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2016

Authors:

Ján Hanzel*, Lucia Majtánová, Jaroslav Halvonik

Keywords:

Foundation Footings, Punching, Reinforced Concrete, Shear Resistance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Muttoni A., Schwartz, J., Behaviour of Beams and Punching in Slabs withoutShear Reinforcement, IABSE Colloquium, Vol. 62, Zurich, Switzerland, 1991, pp.703-708.

Google Scholar

[2] Muttoni A., Fernández Ruiz M., Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement as function of critical shear crack width, ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No 2, (2008).

DOI: 10.14359/19731

Google Scholar

[3] Muttoni, A., Fernández Ruiz, M., The levels of approximation approach in MC 2010: applications to punching shear provisions, Structural Concrete, Ernst&Sohn, Germany, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2012, pp.32-41.

DOI: 10.1002/suco.201100032

Google Scholar

[4] Siburg C., Ricker M., Hegger J., Punching shear design of footings: critical review of different code provisions, Structural Concrete, Ernst&Sohn, Germany, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2014, pp.1-27.

DOI: 10.1002/suco.201300092

Google Scholar

[5] Hegger J., Siburg C., Kueres D., Proposal for punching shear design of flat slabs and column bases based on Eurocode 2, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.064

Google Scholar

[6] Muttoni, A., Fernández Ruiz, M., Proposal for punching shear provisions based on CSCT.

Google Scholar