Errors of In Situ Illuminance Measurements

Article Preview

Abstract:

Lighting conditions in buildings are verified by experts on a daily basis. Such verifications may be done at several phases in various ways. In the field of daylighting, it is common to make an assessment within the pre-design and in-design phases of a construction work throughout calculations, only rarely by measurements. This approach is the opposite of artificial lighting design, which is done within the in-design phase by calculations and is verified by measurements in post-realization phase. The verification of artificial lighting design is required by the building and public health authority otherwise buildings cannot be approved to use. In the field of daylighting, measurements could be performed as well, nevertheless those are often problematic because regulations usually require fulfilments of the daylight factor which can be determined only under CIE overcast sky. Howbeit, both artificial lighting and daylighting measurements are influenced by many errors, e.g. errors of light measurement instruments, measurement conditions, measurement methods and human factor. The paper is focused on this aspect of lighting design, more specifically on the daylighting measurement errors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

676-683

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. F. Reinhart, J. Mardaljevic, Z. Rogers, Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design, LEUKOS, (2006).

DOI: 10.1582/leukos.2006.03.01.001

Google Scholar

[2] R. Hopkinson, G. P. Petherbridge, J. Longmore. Daylighting, Heinemann, London, (1966).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Hayman, Daylight measurement error, Lighting Research and Technology, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] D. Loe, P. Tregenza, The Design of Lighting. Hoboken, Taylor and Francis, (2013).

Google Scholar

[5] CIE Publication No. 69: Methods of characterizing illuminance meters and luminance meters: Performance, characteristics and specifications, Vienna, (1987).

DOI: 10.25039/tr.069.1987

Google Scholar

[6] DIN 5032-7: Photometry, classification of illuminance meters and luminance meters, Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin, (1985).

Google Scholar

[7] ČSN 360011-1: Lighting measurements in areas, Český normalizační institut, Praha, (2014).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Mardaljevic, Verification of program accuracy for illuminance modelling: assumptions, methodology and an examination of conflicting findings, Lighting Research and Technology, (2004).

DOI: 10.1191/1477153504li120oa

Google Scholar

[9] Proceedings of the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, Geneva, (1924).

Google Scholar

[10] CIE (1951). CIE Proceedings 1951. Paris, CIE, (1951).

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. onsetcomp. com/products/data-loggers/u12-012.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. ahlborn. cz/pristroje/kombinovane-merici-pristroje-almemo.

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http: /sensing. konicaminolta. us/products/t-10-t-10m-illuminance-meter.

Google Scholar

[14] F. Vajkay, Optimisation of Light Conditions in Buidlings, Brno University of Technology, Brno, (2012).

Google Scholar