Effort and Effectiveness Considerations in Architectural Design: Two Case Studies of Architectural Design Studios

Abstract:

Contemporary architectural design processes show a high degree of complexity: While planners try to fulfill their client’s expectations, they are confronted with a set of constraints and requirements. These include legal constraints such as different building codes, minimum requirements of thermal, acoustical and energy-related indicators as well as structural integrity. In many planning processes, however, the minimum requirements are even less stringent than self-defined expectations. These could - for instance - include a small environmental footprint of the suggested building materials, near zero heating demand, etc. Furthermore, the majority of architectural design processes face a high level of time and cost pressure. Little is known about the time and effort distribution to different processes within such planning processes. These could include consultation with administrative bodies or specific technical planners, performing computational analyses, sketching conceptional options or layouting final designs. In this context, the present contribution explores the time and effort distribution regarding different tasks within the design process in the framework of two design studios. These were conducted with graduate architectural students of the TU Vienna in 2014 and 2015. The concept of these design studios focused on a realistic emulation of real-world project development processes: Participating students were confronted with different (and evolving) visions of their clients, were asked to perform consultation visits with legal bodies of the Viennese building regulation department, and to monitor their time effort for different tasks. These tasks were defined prior to the design studios and allowed for rather detailed classification of different design steps. The two design studios included a roof top extension of a classical 19th century building in Vienna, and the retrofit and extension of a detached house from the 1930ies. This contribution focuses on the time and effort distribution of the different tasks and explores if a general pattern can be identified and derived from the experiences within these design studios.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 824)
• Pages: 836-844
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.824.836
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Ulrich Pont*, Sigrun Swoboda, Andreas Jonas, Kamyar Tavoussi, Ardeshir Mahdavi
• Keywords: Architectural Design Process, Building Performance, Design Studio, Effectiveness Considerations, Effort Considerations, Structural Integrity

References

[1] U. Huber and S. Weissenböck. Projektabwicklung im Bauwesen. Lecture Notes, Fall Semester 2013, Chair of Construction Process and Enterprise Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland; available online via http: /www. ibi. ethz. ch/bb/education/skript_PA. pdf (accessed July 2015).

[2] A. Mahdavi and S. El-Bellahy: Effort and effectiveness considerations in computational design evaluation: a case study. Building and Environment, Volume 40, Issue 12, December 2005, pp.1651-1664.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.014

[3] P. MacLeamy: MacLeamy Curve. 2004. Available online via: http: /www. msa-ipd. com/MacleamyCurve. pdf (accessed July 2015).

[4] W. Lu, C. Liang, A. Fung, and S. Rowlinson: Demystifiyng the time-effort distribution curves in construction projects: a BIM and non-BIM comparion. ASCE Construction Research Congress 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, Paper-Nr. 329, available online via: http: /sipb. sggw. pl/CRC2014/data/papers/9780784413517. 034. pdf (accessed July 2015).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784413517.034

[5] D. Holzer: Impact of BIM on the effort level in Architecture and Engineering Practice; AEConnect, February 2013; available online via https: /docs. google. com/file/d/0B8iT3_UsbrTFVWZJUzNvWFM3QjQ/edit?usp=sharing (accessed July 2015).

[6] Oberwinter, L.: BIM Sustain – Prozessoptimierung für BIM-gestützte, nachhaltige Planungsmethoden, Presentation, 17. 11. 2014, Graphisoft BIM-Kongress.

[7] Plans, sections, photgraphs of a building in 8th district in Vienna (for development of a roof-top extension).

[8] Plans, sections, photgraphs of a building in 13th district in Vienna (to be re-developed).

[9] European Union: Guideline ECTS (German Version), 2009, available online via: http: /ec. europa. eu/education/tools/docs/ects-guide_de. pdf.

[10] Archiphysik v. 11, v. 12, available online via http: /www. archiphysik. at/ (accessed July 2015).

[11] RuckZuck v. 6; available online via http: /www. ruckzuck. co. at/ (accessed July 2015).

[12] R-Stab v. 9; available online via https: /www. dlubal. com/de/rstab-8xx. aspx (accessed July 2015).

[13] DIN 276-1 - Building costs – Part 1: Building construction; Deutsches Institut für Normung, Version (2007).

[14] OENORM B 1801 – Project and object management in construction – Part 1: Object construction. Austrian Standards Institute, Version 2009-06-01.