Comparison of Biodiesel Production between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Base Catalysts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Homogeneous base catalyst has wide acceptability in biodiesel production because of their fast reaction rates. However, postproduction costs incurred from aqueous quenching, wastewater and loss of catalysts led to the search for alternatives. Heterogeneous base catalyst is developed to cater these problems. The advantages of heterogeneous catalyst are their high basicity and non-toxicity. This work compared the production of biodiesel using two different kind of catalysts that is homogeneous catalyst (sodium hydroxide, NaOH and potassium hydroxide, KOH) and heterogeneous catalysts (calcium, oxide, CaO catalyst derived from chicken and ostrich eggshells). Transesterification of waste cooking oil (WCO) and methanol in the presence of heterogeneous base catalyst was conducted at an optimal reaction condition (calcination temperature for catalyst: 1000 °C; catalyst loading amount: 1.5 wt%; methanol/oil molar ratio: 10:1; reaction temperature: 65 °C; reaction time: 2 hours) with 97% biodiesel yield was obtained. While, the homogeneous base catalyst gave higher biodiesel yield of 98% at optimum operating condition (catalyst concentration: 0.75 wt%; methanol/oil molar ratio: 6:1; reaction temperature: 65 °C; reaction time: 1 hours). The slight difference in the biodiesel yield was due to the stronger basic strength in the homogeneous catalyst and were not statistically not different (p=0.05). However, despite these advances, the ultimate aim of producing biodiesel at affordable low cost and minimal-environmental-impact is yet to be realized.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

71-77

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Zhang, M.A. Dub, D.D. McLean, M. Kates, Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. Bioresour Technol, 89 (2003) 1–16.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00040-3

Google Scholar

[2] M.O. Abdullah. Appl. Energy: an introduction. CRC Press: Boca Raton, New York. (2013) 316-317.

Google Scholar

[3] Y.H. Tan, M.O. Abdullah, C. Nolasco-Hipolito. The potential of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel using heterogeneous catalyst derived from various calcined eggshells coupled with an emulsification technique: A review on the emission reduction and engine performance. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 47 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.048

Google Scholar

[4] A.H. West, D. Posarac, N. Ellis, N, Assessment of four biodiesel production process using HYSYS plant. Bioresour Technol, 99 (2008) 6587–6601.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.046

Google Scholar

[5] J.M. Marchetti, A.F. Errazu, Esterification of free fatty acids using sulfuric acids as catalyst in the presence of triglycerides. Biomass Bioenergy, 32 (2008) 892– 895.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.001

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sakai, A. Kawashima, T. Koshikawa, Economic assessment of batch biodiesel production process using homogeneous and heterogeneous alkali catalysts. Bioresour Technol, 100 (2009) 3268–3276.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.010

Google Scholar

[7] M. Zabeti, W.M.A.W. Daud, M.K. Aroua, Activity of solid catalysts for biodiesel production: a review. Fuel Process Technol 90 (2009) 770–777.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.03.010

Google Scholar

[8] D.Y.C. Leung, X. Wu, M.K.H. Leung, A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy 87 (2010) 1083–95.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006

Google Scholar

[9] D.Y.C. Leung, Y. Guo, Transesterification of neat and used frying oil: optimization for biodiesel production. Fuel Process Technol 87 (2006) 883–90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.003

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Zhang, M.A. Dube, D.D. Mclean, M. Kates, Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresour Technol 90 (2003) 229–40.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00150-0

Google Scholar

[11] B. Freedman, R.O. Butterfield, E.H. Pryde, Transesterification kinetics of soybean oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 63 (1986) 1375–80.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02679606

Google Scholar

[12] B. Freedman, E.H. Pryde, T.L. Mounts, Variables effecting the yields of fatty esters from transesterified vegetable oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61 (1984) 1638–43.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02541649

Google Scholar

[13] T. Eevera, K. Rajendran, S. Saradha, Biodiesel production process optimization and characterization to assess the suitability of the product for varied environmental conditions. Renew Energy 34 (2009) 762–5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.006

Google Scholar