Nonlinear Probabilistic Analysis of the Failure Pressure of NPP Shielding Plate

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper describes the nonlinear probabilistic analysis of the failure pressure of the shielding plate of the reactor box of the nuclear power plant under a high internal overpressure and temperature. The scenario of the hard accident in Nuclear power plant (NPP) and the methodology of the calculation of the fragility curve of the failure overpressure using the probabilistic safety assessment PSA 2 level is presented. The fragility curve of the failure pressure was determined using 45 probabilistic simulations using the response surface method (RSM) with the Central Composite Design (CCD) for 106 Monte Carlo simulations for each model and 5 level of the overpressure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

214-221

Citation:

Online since:

June 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] NRC, RG 1. 200, An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] IAEA, Safety Series No. SSG-4, Development and Application of Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna, (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] NRA SR, Stress Tests for Nuclear Power Plants in Slovakia, sept. 2011, Report NRA Bratislava.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Kralik, Safety and Reliability of Nuclear Power Buildings in Slovakia. Earthquake-Impact-Explosion. Publishing house STU Bratislava, 2009, 307 pp. ISBN 978-80-227-3112-6.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kralik, Reliability Analysis of Structures Using Stochastic Finite Element Method, Publishing house STU Bratislava, 2009, 143 pp. ISBN 978-80-227-3130-0.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Kralik et al., Structural Reliability for Containment of VVER 440/213 Type, in: Nowakowski et al. (Eds. ), Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2015, pp.2279-2286.

DOI: 10.1201/b17399-312

Google Scholar

[7] J. Kralik, J. Kralik, jr., Probabilistic Nonlinear Analysis of Bubble Tower Structure due to Extreme Pressure and Temperature, in: Proc. Archive of EM2015, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, in Press, September (2015).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.821.725

Google Scholar

[8] P. Kohnke, ANSYS, Theory, SAS IP Inc., Canonsburg, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] HANDBOOK 5. Implementation of Eurocodes Reliability Backgrounds. Design of Buildings for the Fire Situation. Development of Skills Facilitating Implementation of Eurocodes. Leonardo Da Vinci Pilot Project CZ/02/B/F/PP-134007, Prague, CR, 10/(2005).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Cajka, M. Krejsa, Measured Data Processing in Civil Structure Using the DOProC, Method, Advanced Materials Research 859 (2013) 114-121. DOI 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/ AMR. 859. 114.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.859.114

Google Scholar

[11] J. Gottwald, Z. Kala, Sensitivity analysis of tangential digging forces of the bucket wheel excavator SchRs 1320 for different terraces, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18: 5 (2012) 609-620.

DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2012.719836

Google Scholar

[12] A. Haldar, S. Mahadevan, Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[13] JCSS 2011. JCSS Probabilistic Model Code. Zurich: Joint Committee on Structural Safety. <www. jcss. byg. dtu. dk>.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4730(97)00008-8

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Kala, Sensitivity analysis of steel plane frames with initial imperfections, Engineering Structures 33: 8 (2011) 2342-2349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.007

Google Scholar

[15] P. Konecny, J. Brozovsky, V. Krivy, Simulation Based Reliability Assessment Method using Parallel Computing, in: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing for Engineering, Civil Comp Proceedings, 2009, Iss. 90, p.542.

DOI: 10.4203/ccp.90.38

Google Scholar

[16] M. Krejsa, Probabilistic failure analysis of steel structures exposed to fatigue, Key Engineering Materials Vols. 577-578 (2014) 101-104.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.577-578.101

Google Scholar

[17] P. Suchardova, A. Bernatik, O. Sucharda, Assessment of loss results by means of multi - Criteria analysis, in: Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - Proc. of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2011, 2012, CRC Press-Taylor & Francis group, London, pp.1563-1570.

DOI: 10.1201/b11433-221

Google Scholar

[18] M. Sykora, M. Holicky, Assessment of Uncertainties in Mechanical Models, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 378 (2013) 13-18. Doi: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/AMM. 378. 13.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.378.13

Google Scholar

[19] S. Vejvoda, Z. Kersner, D. Novak, B. Teply, Probabilistic Safety Assessment of the Steam Generator Cover, in: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 17), August 17-22, 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, in CD, M04-4, 10 pp.

Google Scholar