Performance of Reactive Powder Concrete Partial Prestressed Beam-Column Sub-Assemblage Structure System with Partial Prestressed Ratio Exceeds 30%

Article Preview

Abstract:

Research on concrete material in many countries resulted a concrete type of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) which has a high performance in terms of compressive strength, ductility, durability, and modulus of elasticity using Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC). Research on structural engineering using RPC material shows better performance than normal concrete (NC) to resist gravity and cyclic loads. In this study, the experiments were conducted under the combination of constant axial and cyclic loads on the structure of the partial prestressed interior and exterior beam-column subassemblages with partial prestressed ratio value of 31.72% on the beam. The application of cyclic loading was conducted by displacement control based on the ACI 374.1-05. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of structures based on three moment frame acceptance criteria presented in the ACI 374.1-05. From the test results, the interior and exterior beam-column subassemblage structure systems showed performance that adequated all of these criteria at the drift ratio of 3.50% and 2.20%, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

126-131

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Richard, P., dan Cheyrezy, M., Composition of Reactive Powder Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 25 No. 7 (1995) 1501 – 1511.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2

Google Scholar

[2] Thompson, K. J. dan Park, R., Ductility of Prestressed and Partially Prestressed Concrete Beam Sections, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal (March-April 1980) 46-70.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03011980.46.70

Google Scholar

[3] ACI Committee, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, USA (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[4] Gowripalan, N., Watters, R., Gilbert, R. I, and Cavill, B., Reactive Powder Concrete for Precast Structural Concrete-Research and Development in Australia, 21st Biennial Conference of The Concrete Institut of Australia, Brisbane, Australia (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Graybeal, B. A., Compressive Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete, ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 104, No. 2 (March-April 2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Menefy, L., Investigation of Reactive Powder Concrete and Its Damping Characteristics When Utilized in Beam Eelements. Thesis of Doctor Philosophy, Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Australia (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Naibaho, P. R., Budiono, B., Surono, A., Pane, I., Experimental Study of Reinforcement Addition on Exterior Beam-Column Connections Using Reactive Powder Under Cyclic Load, Proceedings of the National Conference in Graduate Program of Civil Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology (2014).

DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2016.48.4.4

Google Scholar

[8] ACI Committee, Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary, ACI 374. 1-05, Farmington Hills, USA (2005).

Google Scholar