A Fractional Generalised Finite Difference Method to Linear Porous Media Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The generalised finite difference method (GFDM) is a mesh-free method for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in non-structured grids. Due to its strong theoretical background and simplicity, hence efficiency, it has been introduced to handle interesting and sophisticate engineering problems. However, the GFDM has not been applied to problems associated to dynamics of porous media yet. In these problems, the strong coupling between solid displacements and liquid pressures may cause large numerical oscillations if equal order interpolation functions are used for both variables. Nevertheless, some fractional steps techniques can be introduced in order to minimise these problems. In this contribution, a fractional steps scheme is developed and applied to the GFDM in order to model fully saturated porous media dynamics. Simulations of 1D and 2D wave propagation are performed in order to reveal the advantages, drawbacks and capabilities of the proposed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

403-408

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Benito, J. J., & Gavete, L. (2001). Influence of several factors in the generalised finite difference method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 25, 1039–1053.

DOI: 10.1016/s0307-904x(01)00029-4

Google Scholar

[2] Brezzi, F., 1974, On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrange multipliers, R. A. I. R. O. 8(R2): 129-151.

DOI: 10.1051/m2an/197408r201291

Google Scholar

[3] de Boer, R., Ehlers, W. and Liu, Z., 1993, One-dimensional wave propagation in fluid saturated incompressible porous media. Archive of Applied Mechanics. 63(1): 59-72.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00787910

Google Scholar

[4] Huang, M. and Zienkiewicz, O. C. 1998. New unconditionally stable staggered solution procedures for coupled soil-pore fluid dynamic problems. IJNME 43(6): 1029-1052.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19981130)43:6<1029::aid-nme459>3.0.co;2-h

Google Scholar

[5] Lewis, R.W. and Schrefler, B. A. 1998. The finite element method in the static and dynamic deformation and consolidation of porous media. (2nd eds), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Baffins Lane, Chichester: England.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1484(200001)5:1<85::aid-cfm94>3.0.co;2-8

Google Scholar

[6] Liszka, T., & Orkisz, J. (1980). The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics. Computers & Structures, 11(1-2), 83–95. doi: 10. 1016/0045-7949(80)90149-2.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(80)90149-2

Google Scholar

[7] Markert, B., Heider, Y. and Ehlers, W. 2010. Comparison of monolithic and splitting solution schemes for dynamic porous media problems. IJNME 82(11): 1341-1383.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.2789

Google Scholar

[8] Pedroso, D. M. (2015). A consistent u-p formulation for porous media with hysteresis. IJNME, 101(8), 606–634. doi: 10. 1002/nme. 4808.

Google Scholar

[9] Pedroso DM. (2015) A solution to transient seepage in unsaturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 285: 791–816. doi: 10. 1016/j. cma. 2014. 12. 009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.12.009

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang, Y. P., Pedroso, D. M., & Li, L. (2014). Assessment of finite difference methods to solve porous media dynamics. IACMAG 2014 (p.1433–1438). CRC Press. doi: 10. 1201/b17435.

DOI: 10.1201/b17435-252

Google Scholar