Characteristics of Cultivated Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria Community Isolated from Coal Mine Treatment Plant in H2S Removal

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sulfur cycling based on biological oxidation of sulfide to sulfate involves sulfur-oxidizing reducing microbial communities associated with sulfide which normally oxidize sulfide in acidic environment to sulfate. The chemolithotrophic sulfur oxidizing bacteria (SOB) usually use organic and/ or inorganic sulfide initially oxidizing and subsequently released sulfate under aerobic or subaerobic condition. This study was to understand SOB community isolated from coal mine treating plant at Mae Moh, Lampang and their potentials in hydrogen sulfide (H2S) removal. In this result, with common heterotrophic medium supplemented with glucose 10 mg/ L and sulfur 0.001%, the cultured SOB were successfully cultivated based on most probable number method. Their activity showed an increase in sulfate concentration over time correspondent to an increase in culturable SOB communities. The SOB community could also develop their own microbial niches in the present of continuously aerated H2S in the medium at 30-40°C during 7 day incubation. They could remove H2S between 200-500 ppm from wastewater. These sulfur oxidized H2S contaminated in wastewater treatment facilities or drainage. Their species will be further isolated and characterized by molecular analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

127-130

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. H. Yang, K. Stöven, S. Haneklaus, B. R. Sing, E. Schnug, Elemental sulfur oxidation by Thiobacillus spp. and aerobic heterotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, Pedosphere 20 (1) (2010) 71–79.

DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(09)60284-8

Google Scholar

[2] T. Lambert, V. M. Goodwin, D. Stefani, L. Strosher, Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and sour gas effects on the eye, A historical perspective, Sci. Total Environ. 367 (2006) 1–22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.034

Google Scholar

[3] K. S. Cho, L. Zhang, M. Hirai, M. Shoda, Removal characteristics of hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol by Thiobacillus sp. isolated from peat in biological deodorization, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 71 (1991) 44-49.

DOI: 10.1016/0922-338x(91)90302-w

Google Scholar

[4] X. G. Chen, A. L. Geng, R. Yan, W. D. Gould, Y. L. NG, D. T. LIANNG, Isolation and characterization of sulphur-oxidizing Thiomonas sp. and its potential application in biological deodorization. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 39 (6) (2004) 495-503.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01615.x

Google Scholar

[5] Y. C. Chung, C. Huang, C. F. Li , Removal characteristics of H2S by Thiobacillus novellus CH13 biofilter in autotrophic and mixotrophic environments, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 32 (1997) 1435-1450.

DOI: 10.1080/10934529709376619

Google Scholar

[6] K. S. Cho, M. Hirai, M. Shoda, Degradation characteristics of hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide by Thiobacillus thioparus DW44 isolated from peat biofilter, J. Ferment. Bioeng. 71 (1991) 384-389.

DOI: 10.1016/0922-338x(91)90248-f

Google Scholar

[7] E. Y. Lee, N. Y. Lee, K. S. Cho, H. W. Ryu, Removal of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate-resistant Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans AZ11, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101 (4) (2006) 309-14.

DOI: 10.1263/jbb.101.309

Google Scholar

[8] D. G. Hooper, J. Shane, D. C. Straus, K. H. Kilburn, V. Bolton, J. S. Sutton, F. T. Guilford, Isolation of sulfur reducing and oxidizing bacteria found in contaminated drywall, Int. J Mol. Sci. 11 (2010) 647-655.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms11020647

Google Scholar

[9] R. Vidyalakshmi, R. Sridar, Isolation and characterization of sulphur oxidizing bacteria, J. Cult. Collec. 5 (2006) 73-77.

Google Scholar

[10] E. G. Donati, G. Curutchet, C. Pogliani, P. Tedesco, Bioleaching of covellite using pure and mixed cultures of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Process Biochem. 31 (2) (1996) 129-134.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-9592(95)00037-2

Google Scholar