Paper Titles

Non-Destructive Testing of High Temperature Degraded Concrete Composite of Portland Cement CEM I 42.5 R and Gravel Aggregate 11/22 by Transverse Waves
p.270

A Research of the Senior Cognition on the Co-Housing Building Type
p.275

Optimization of Concrete Porous Mix Using Slag as Substitute Material for Cement and Aggregates
p.282

Experimental Study of Composite High Strength Self-Compacting Concrete
p.289

Numerical Investigation of Four Seismic Upgrading Techniques on a Masonry Bell Tower
p.295

Evaluation of Green Building Energy-Saving Technology Based on Entropy Weight Method
p.301

Shaking Table Test Study of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Structure
p.306

Incremental Formulation of Concrete Creep under Stress History
p.313

Experimental Static Load Test of Prestressed Concrete Slab-on-Ground Model
p.320

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 865Numerical Investigation of Four Seismic Upgrading...

Numerical Investigation of Four Seismic Upgrading Techniques on a Masonry Bell Tower

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents some preliminary results from the numerical investigations of different interventions for the seismic upgrading of a masonry bell tower. Masonry bell towers belong to the cultural and historical heritage, are very widespread in Italy and their conservation has been given special attention in recent years. Their high vulnerability is related to the combination of mechanical material properties, geometrical irregularities, presence of inclination, foundation settlements and seismicity of the area. The present tower is located in Emilia Romagna Region, Northern Italy, recently stricken by a strong seismic sequence in May 2012. Analyses results show that the retrofitting of masonry bell towers is highly recommended in order to mitigate their present seismic risk. Four different upgrading techniques, consisting of grouted mortar, FRP sheets, internal steel frame and prestressing vertical rods, are investigated and compared in terms of structural performance improvement. The grouted mortar and internal steel frame techniques are found to be reasonable solutions when compared to the other proposals for the specific seismic intensity level. Furthermore, the other techniques have a relatively high level of invasiveness which is recommended to be avoid where possible. Experience has shown that the most effective interventions are those that not only protect the structure, but also preserve the built heritage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Engineering Technology III

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 865)

Pages:

295-300

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.865.295

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2017

Authors:

Gabriele Milani*, Rafael Shehu, Marco Valente

Keywords:

FRP Composites, Grouted Mortar, Masonry Bell Tower, Prestressed Bars, Retrofitting, Seismic Vulnerability, Steel Frame

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] DM 14/01/2008. New Technical Norms on Constructions. Rome, Italy, (2008).

[2] DPCM 9/2/2011. Italian guidelines for the evaluation and the reduction of the seismic risk for the built heritage, with reference to the Italian norms of constructions. Rome, Italy, (2011).

[3] M. Valente, G. Milani, Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM, Constr. Build. Mater. 108 (2016) 74-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025

[4] G. Milani, M. Valente, Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: Possibilities of non-linear finite elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms, Eng. Fail. Anal. 47 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.016

[5] M. Valente, G. Milani, Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM, Constr. Build. Mater. 108 (2016) 74-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025

[6] G. Milani, M. Valente, Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches, Eng. Fail. Anal. 54 (2015) 13-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016

[7] S. Casolo, G. Milani, G. Uva, C. Alessandri, Comparative seismic vulnerability analysis on ten masonry towers in the coastal Po Valley in Italy, Eng. Struct. 49 (2013) 465-490.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.033

[8] F. Minghini, E. Bertolesi, A. Del Grosso, G. Milani, A. Tralli, Modal pushover and response history analyses of a masonry chimney before and after shortening, Eng. Struct. 110 (2016) 307-324.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.016

[9] C. Modena, M. R. Valluzzi, R. Tongini Folli, L. Binda, Design choices and intervention techniques for repairing and strengthening of the Monza cathedral bell-tower, Constr. Build. Mater. 16 (2002) 385-395.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(02)00041-7

[10] P. Riva, F. Perotti, E. Guidoboni, E. Boschi, Seismic analysis of the Asinelli Tower and earthquakes in Bologna, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 17 (1998) 525-550.

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(98)00009-8

[11] J. Heyman, Leaning towers, Meccanica 27 (1992) 153-159.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00430041

[12] G. Milani, R. Shehu, M. Valente, Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches, Bull. Earth. Eng. 2016. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-016-0043-0.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-0043-0

[13] R. Fedele, G. Milani, A numerical insight into the response of masonry reinforced by FRP strips. The case of perfect adhesion, Compos. Struct. 92 (2010) 2345-2357.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.03.014

[14] G. Milani, R. Shehu, M. Valente, Seismic Upgrading Of A Masonry Church With FRP Composites, Mater. Sci. Forum. 866 (2016) 119-123.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.866.119

[15] C. N. R, Instructions for the Design, Excecution and Maintance of Static Consolidation Interventions through the use of Fiber-Reinforced Composites, (2014).

[16] R. Fedele, G. Milani, Three-dimensional effects induced by FRP-from-masonry delamination, Compos. Struct. 93 (2011) 1819-1831.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.022

[17] A. P. Quiroz, S. T. Sperbeck, H. Budelmann, G. Bartoli, E. Bazrafshan, Seismic Risk Mitigation of Historical Masonry Towers by Means of Prestressing Devices, Adv. Mater. Res. 133-134 (2010) 843–848.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.133-134.843

[18] M. Lualdi, F. Lombardi, Significance of GPR polarisation for improving target detection and characterization, Nondestruct. Test. Evaluat. 29 (2014) 345-356.

DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2014.949708

[19] M. Lualdi, F. Lombardi, Combining orthogonal polarization for elongated target detection with GPR, J. Geophys. Eng. 11 (2014) 8.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/11/5/055006

[20] T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 65 (2000).

[21] G. Milani, P. B. Lourenço, A. Tralli, Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls, Part I: Failure surfaces, Comput. Struct. 84 (2006) 166-180.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.005

[22] D. Darwin, D. A. Pecknold, Inelastic model for cyclic biaxial loading of reinforced concrete, (1974).

[23] P. Fajfar, A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design, Earthq. Spectra 16 (2000) 573-592.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1586128