Life Cycle Assessment on Layer-Combustion Hot-Water Boiler

Article Preview

Abstract:

Resource consumption, energy consumption, environmental impact and costs of layer-combustion boiler were assessed by using life cycle assessment (LCA). The costs during construction stage, resource and energy consumption during operation stage of layer-combustion hot-water boiler were focused on. Life cycle inventory was established. The results show that: throughout the boiler life cycle, the largest resource consumption indicator is that of coal with value of 93%, followed by natural gas and limestone. For the internal costs, although operation costs are obviously higher than construction costs, the construction costs still account for more than 30%, which is related to the relatively short servicetime of layer-combustion heating boilers. For the external costs, global warming accounts for the highest proportion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

285-291

Citation:

Online since:

November 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. C. Dickerman, K. L. Johnson. EPA technology report for industrial boiler applications: NOx flue gastreatment. EPA-600/7-79-178g. (1979).

Google Scholar

[2] K. A. Golonka, D. J. Brennan, Costs and Environmental Impacts in Pollutant Treatment: A Case Study of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions from Metallurgical Smelters, Proc. Saf. Envir. Protect. 75 (1997) 232-244.

DOI: 10.1205/095758297529110

Google Scholar

[3] E. Vyzi, A. Azapagic, Life Cycle Assessment as a tool for identifying the Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO), Research report, University of Surrey, (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Cottrell, J. Nunn, A. Urfer, et a1., Systems assessment of electricity generation using biomass and coal in CFBC. Australian: BHP Billiton Newcastle Technology Centre, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] C. W. Babbitt, A. S. Lindner, A life cycle inventory of coal used for electricity production in Florida, J. Clean. Prod. 13 (2005) 903-912.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.04.007

Google Scholar

[6] N. A. Odeh, T. T. Cockeril. Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energ. Conv. Manag. 49(2) (2008) 212-220.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.014

Google Scholar

[7] L. Zhou, C. Liu, Assessment on whole Life cycle of clean coal-fired power generation technology, Proceedings of the CSEE, 31 (2011) 7-14.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Bu, J. Xiao, L. Shen, L. Chen, Life cycle assessment of biomass combustion power generation based on analytic hierarchy process, Acta. Energ. Sol. Sin. 36 (2015) 994-1003.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Ma, Comparison of environmental impact for three different coal-fired boilers using life cycle assessment method, Clean Coal Tech. 22 (2016) 66-70.

Google Scholar

[10] National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China, 2014 China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing, (2015).

Google Scholar