Causative Chains that Leads to Ship Collisions in Japanese Maritime Traffic System (MTS) as Final Outcome of MOP Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is written as one of the records of MOP model developments. MOP model is a new creation model for re-analyzing accidents in maritime traffic system (MTS). MOP is an abbreviation from 4M Overturned Pyramid, where 4M is Man, Machine, Media, and Management. The MOP Model is a 3D view model, looks like thee sided inverted pyramid that has 4 corners representing 4M and 6 edges as line relation for corners. At this paper, MOP model has been developed until the last steps. There are 2 steps utilizing MOP model when re-analyzing accidents, namely Corner Analysis (CA) that resulting causative factors (CFs) as the first step, and Line Relation Analysis (LRA) that resulting causative chains (CCs) as the second step. To see how this step works, 20 ship collisions in Japanese MTS have been re-analyzed. In this research, MOP Model has been upgraded until the second step, namely Line Relation Analysis (LRA). The outcome of this step is causative chain (CC). The results is there is core causative chain that has several heads and tails. However, most of the causative factor (CF) that perform CC are classified in Man Factor, especially improper look-out.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

221-227

Citation:

Online since:

January 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Japan Transportation Safety Board's official website, Available: http: /jtsb. mlit. go. jp/jtsb/ship.

Google Scholar

[2] Japan Transportation Safety Board's official website, Available: http: /www. mlit. go. jp/jtsb/marrep. html.

Google Scholar

[3] Wanginingastuti M., Achmadi B. S., and Masao F., Introducing 4M Overturned Pyramid (MOP) model to analyze accidents in Maritime Traffic System (MTS): A case study on collisions in Japan based on occurrence time", In: Proc. ISOCEEN 2015 Conference, (2015).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.862.220

Google Scholar

[4] Wanginingastuti M., and Masao F., The improper look-out that leads to ship collisions in Japan, In: Proc. Asia Navigation Conference (ANC), (2016).

Google Scholar

[5] M.R. Grech, T.J. Horberry, T. Koester, Human Factors in the Maritime Domain, CRC Press, France, (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Furusho, IM model for ship safety, In: Proc. of Inaugural General Assembly, Turkey (2000) 26-31.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Furusho, Disaster of Italian passenger ship Costa Concordia – a nightmare 100 years after the Titanic, The Mariners's Digest, 28 (2013) 31-35.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Chauvin et al, Human and organizational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59 (2013) 26-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006

Google Scholar

[9] MAIB, Bridge Watchkeeping Safety Study, Safety Study, 1, Southampton, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] P. Sotiralis, Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focusing on human centered desigm aspects, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 156 (2016) 210-227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.007

Google Scholar