Design and Analysis of Powered Ankle-Foot Mechanism Using Hydraulic System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently available foot prosthesis model are more than 50 in number. In order to perform some extraordinary errands, for example, strolling, moving, cycling, golfing, swimming, snow skiing or running they are employed. Many are waterproof and made of lightweight materials, for example, plastic, metal combinations and carbon-fiber composites. Prosthetic feet can be essential (unmoving), explained (moving in at least one bearings), or element reaction (putting away and returning vitality when strolling, giving a feeling of "pushing off," much like the human foot). However there are certain problems which are not completely tackled by the currently available prosthesis for which the walking pattern remains strongly disturbed. Today's prosthetic feet may have toe and heel springs to permit more lower leg development and movable heel statures, and to assimilate stun but the load distribution is not proper which leads to fatigue. In this paper, a powered ankle-foot prosthesis mechanism that aims at the equal distribution of the load using a hydraulic system in order to store the energy in the spring over the movement of prosthetic ankle was presented. Although the prosthetic foot presented in this paper is driven by an electric-motor it is made lighter and robust than the currently available ones. Some primary experiments were conducted by taking the forces acting to account. A 3-D model of the proposed design was made using piston cylinder arrangement in order to get a real ankle like movement, thereafter the stress analysis of the same was done and results were discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

384-390

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. K. Klute, J. Czerniecki, and B. Hannaford, 'Development of powered prosthetic lower limb,', in Proc. 1st Nat. Meeting, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation R&D Service, Washington, DC, Oct. (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Herr, D. Paluska, P. Dilworth, and S. Kwau, 'A hybrid actuator comprising motor, spring and variable-damper elements,', Patent Provisional F-51 SN 60/666,876, Mar. 31, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] S. K. Au, J. Weber, and H. Herr, 'Biomechanical design of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis,', in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2007.4428441

Google Scholar

[4] S. Au, M. Berniker, and H. Herr, Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,, Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 4, May 2008, p.654–666.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.006

Google Scholar

[5] Gregory S Sawicki and Daniel P Ferris 'A pneumatically powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) with myoelectric activation and inhibition,, Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation (2009).

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-23

Google Scholar

[6] M Todd Farrell and Hugh Herr A method to determine the optimal features for control of a powered lower-limb prostheses,, 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Boston, Massachusetts USA, August 30 - September 3, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2011.6091493

Google Scholar

[7] Alena M.Grabowski and Susan D'Andrea,'Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the unaffected leg during level ground walking,', Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation (2013).

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-49

Google Scholar

[8] David Hill & Hugh Herr, Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the contralateral limb,, Media Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2013.6650375

Google Scholar

[9] Carl D.Hoover, George D.Fulk, and Kevin B. Fite,Stair Ascent with a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis Under Direct Myoelectric Control,, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics VOL. 18, NO. 3, JUNE (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2012.2200498

Google Scholar

[10] Shultz AH, Lawson BE, Goldfarb M, Variable Cadence Walking and Ground Adaptive Standing With a Powered Ankle Prosthesis,, IEEE Transneural System Rehabilitation Engineering, Apr (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2015.2428196

Google Scholar

[11] Jeremy D Brown, Timothy S Kunz and Duane Gardner, An emperical Evaluation of Force Feedback in Body Powered Prostheses,, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Volume: 25, Issue: 3, March (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2016.2554061

Google Scholar

[12] Elissa D. Ledoux  and Michael Goldfarb, Control and Evaluation of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis for Stair Ascent,, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering ( Volume: PP, Issue: 99 ) January (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2017.2656467

Google Scholar

[13] Anne E. Martin  and Robert D. Gregg, Stable, Robust Hybrid Zero Dynamics Control of Powered Lower-Limb Prostheses,, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (Volume: PP, Issue: 99) January (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2017.2648040

Google Scholar

[14] E. D.Ledoux, B. E. Lawson, A. H. Shultz, H. L. Bartlett, and M. Goldfarb, Metabolics of Stair Ascent with a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis,, presented at the IEEE/EMBS Eng. Medicine Biology Conf., (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/embc.2015.7319589

Google Scholar

[15] K. A.Ingraham, N. P. Fey, A. M. Simon, and L. J. Hargrove, Assessing the Relative Contributions of Active Ankle and Knee Assistance to the Walking Mechanics of Transfemoral Amputees Using a Powered Prosthesis,, PloS One, vol. 11, p. e0147661, (2016).

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147661

Google Scholar

[16] A. H. Shultz, B. E. Lawson, and M. Goldfarb, Running with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis,, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2014.2336597

Google Scholar

[17] D.Datta, B.Heller, and J.Howitt, A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control,, Clinical Rehabil., vol. 19, pp.398-403, (2005).

DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr805oa

Google Scholar