The Impact Factors of Numerical Computation to Cavitating Flow

Wei Bao Xu; Chao Wang; Miao He; Sheng Huang; Xin Chang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.88-89.404

Paper Titles

L1-Norm Sparse Learning and its Application
p.379

Research of Key Nodes of Botnet Based on P2P
p.386

Simulation of Concrete Temperature Cracking Process Based on EFGM
p.395

An Effective Classification Procedure for Plastic Food Packaging Based on NIRS
p.399

The Impact Factors of Numerical Computation to Cavitating Flow
p.404

3-D Numerical Simulation and Analysis on V-Cone Flowmeter Based on LES Method
p.408

Software Development Based on Object-Oriented Design for Parachute Design and Performance Analysis
p.413

Simulation of the New Dynamic Combined Separator
p.418

A Preliminary Study of Ecopath with Ecosim to the Shrimp Pond Ecosystem
p.423

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 88-89The Impact Factors of Numerical Computation to...

The Impact Factors of Numerical Computation to Cavitating Flow

Abstract:

Steady cavity flow of 2-D hydrofoil is simulated by CFD software. The impacts of different cavitation models, turbulence models and wall functions to the numerical simulation results are analyzed. The pressure distributing curve and volume fraction distributing map are obtained through detailed analysis to cavity flow under different cavity number. The analysis results show that those cavitation models simulate the origination and forming process of cavity preferably, which match experiment values closely. However, there are some differences among the results of those different cavitation models in the cavity closing area. The results of RNGmodel and the RSM model are more uniformity with the experiment values, but there is large distinctive between the result of the standard and the experiment values. The results of the standard wall function and the non-equilibrium wall function which have distinction with the experiment values are closed, but the enhanced wall function is the most accurate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Computer-Aided Design, Manufacturing, Modeling and Simulation

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 88-89)

Pages:

404-407

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.88-89.404

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2011

Authors:

Wei Bao Xu, Chao Wang, Miao He, Sheng Huang, Xin Chang

Keywords:

2-D Hydrofoil, Cavitation Model, Numerical Simulation, Turbulent Model, Wall Function

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] FLUENT 6. 3 Documentation. Fluent Inc.

Google Scholar

[2] Wang Fujun. The analysis of computation fluid dynamics—the based theory and application of CFD[M]. Tsinghua University Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Ashok K. Singhal, et al. Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model. ASME-FEDSM'01, New Orleans, Louisiana, (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] Kutoba A, Kato H, Yamaguchi H. A new modelling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section[J]. J. Fluid Mech., 1992, 240: 59-96.

DOI: 10.1017/s002211209200003x

Google Scholar

[5] Merkle C, Feng J, Buelow P. Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, 1998, 307-311.

Google Scholar

[6] Sheng Zhenbang, Liu Yingzhong. The theory of ship. Shang Hai Jiao tong University Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] Yakhot V. Orszag S A. Renormalization group of turbulence. 1. Basic theory. Science Computation, 1: 3, (1986).

Google Scholar

[8] B. Kader. Temperature and Concentration Profiles in Fully Turbulent Boundary Layers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 24(9): 1541-1544, (1993).

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9

Google Scholar