The Performance Estimation on the CCHP with Optimal Operation

Abstract:

In this paper, the performance of CCHP with optimal operation were investigated, and theimpact of the time-use-price were analyzed. The results shown that the operation cost can beobviously save with optimal operation strategy than the HET strategies. The main reason to reduceconst is more power generation by the generator, it means that the generator efficiency is higher, sothe primary energy ratio got obvious improvement and carbon dioxide emissions are also reduced inoptimal operation. The TOU can reduce the operation cost, and induce more purchasing electricity ofCCHP in peak-off period. But the primary energy ratio almost did not improve, and carbon dioxideemissions increased in the TOU case.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 893)
• Pages: 89-94
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.893.89
• Online since: July 2019
• Authors: Hong Tao Wang*
• Keywords: Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Combined Cooling Heat, Combined Cooling Power, Operation Cost, Optimal Operation Strategy, Primary Energy Ratio

References

[1] International Energy Agency. Combined heat and power: evaluating the benefits of greater global investment. Paris, France; (2008).

[2] Environmental Protection Agency. Combined heat and power: a clean energy solution; (2012).

[3] H. Cho, A. D. Smith, P. Mago, Combined cooling, heating and power: A review of performance improvement and optimization, Appl. Energy, 136 (2014) 168-185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.107

[4] W. Gu, Z. Wu, R. Bo, W. Liu, G. Zhou, W. Chen, Z. Wu, Modeling, planning and optimal energy management of combined cooling, heating and power microgrid: A review, Electrical Power and Energy Syst. 54 (2014) 26-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.06.028

[5] P. J. Mago, N. Fumo, L. M. Chamra, Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the thermal and electric load, Int. J. of Energy Res. 33(9) (2009) 852–864.

DOI: 10.1002/er.1526

[6] A. Moran, P. J. Mago, L. M. Chmra, Thermo economic modeling of micro-CHP for small commercial applications, Int. J. Energy Res. 32(9) (2008) 808-823.

DOI: 10.1002/er.1395

[7] M. Liu, Y. Shi, F. Fang, A new operation strategy for CCHP systems with hybrid chillers, Appl. Energy, 95 (2012) 164-173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.035

[8] C. Y. Zheng, J. Y. Wu, X. Q. Zhai, A novel operation strategy for CCHP systems based on minimum distance. Appl. Energy, 128 (2014) 325-335.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.084

[9] J. J. Wang, J. Sui, H. G. Jin, An improved operation strategy of combined cooling heating and power system following electrical load, Eergy, 85 (2015) 654-666.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.003

[10] T. Guo, M. I. Henwood, M. V. Ooijen, An Algorithm for Combined Heat and Power Economic Dispatch, IEEE Trans. on Power Syst. 11(4) (1996) 1778-1784.

DOI: 10.1109/59.544642

[11] Y.H. Song, C.S. Chou, T.J. Stonham, Combined heat and power economic dispatch by improved ant colony search algorithm, Electric Power Syst. Res. 52(2) (1999) 115-121.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7796(99)00011-5

[12] A. Rong, R. Lahdelma, An efficient envelope-based Branch and Bound algorithm for non-convex combined heat and power production planning, Eur. J. of Oper. Res. 183(1) (2007) 412-431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.072

[13] Y. Zhongyuan, Z. Bin,Optimal Operation Stratetegies and their determining conditions for CCHP Systems with two cooling ways, Automation of Electric Power Systems 2018, 42(5) 18-24.

[14] Y. Li, B. Zou, F. Zhu, J. Fu, An Optimal Planning method for CCHP Systems Based on Operation Simulation, 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Smart Energy Grid Eng. (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/sege.2018.8499483