Accuracy of Three Bracket Transfer Media for Indirect Bonding Techniques (IDB) Fabricated by Three-Dimensional Printing

Article Preview

Abstract:

To evaluate and compare the accuracy of bracket placement in three bracket transfer media techniques for indirect bonding. A total of 300 brackets were bonded on dental casts by indirect bonding techniques using three different bracket transfer media. The bracket positions were simulated by digital software. In the first two methods, digital models were designed with two types of markers, one with fully mocked up bracket (container method), and another with only marked bracket margins (marker method), then the models were printed out by a three-dimensional (3D) printer using pink resin and bracket transfer trays were vacuum formed on these models with polyvinylsiloxane. In the third methods, digital software was used to design full arch transfer trays, and printed by a stereolithographic 3D printer using elastic resin. With the transfer trays, the brackets were bonded onto dental stone casts, and a 3D model scanner was used to capture the final bracket positions on the casts. Superimpositions between the planned and actual bracket positions were done. Nonparametric statistical analyses were used to determine whether there were significant differences between planned and actual bracket positions and between the three methods. All significant differences in bracket position were less than 0.31 mm and most (95%) were less than 0.08 mm. Significant differences between all three methods were found. Indirect bonding methods using digital software combined with 3D printing show good accuracy with clinically insignificant positional discrepancies of less than 0.5mm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

179-184

Citation:

Online since:

April 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Silverman, M. Cohen, A. A. Gianelly, V. S. Dietz, A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets, Am. J. Orthod. 62(3) (1972) 236-244.

DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90264-3

Google Scholar

[2] J. T. Kalange, Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the advantages, World J. Orthod. 5(4) (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] M. W. Brown, L. Koroluk, C. C. Ko, K. Zhang, M. Chen, T Nguyen, Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system, Am. J. Orthod. Dentof. 148(6) (2015) 1067-1074.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.029

Google Scholar

[4] A. Westerlund, W. Tancredi, M. Ransjo, A. Bresin, S. Psonis, O. Torgersson, Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems, Am. J. Orthod. Dentof. 147(4) (2015) 509-516.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.020

Google Scholar

[5] M. L. Quimby, K. W. Vig, R. G. Rashid, A. R. Firestone, The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models, Angle Orthod. 74(3) (2004) 298-303.

Google Scholar

[6] P. S. Fleming, V. Marinho, A. Johal, Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review, Orthod. Craniof. Res. 14(1) (2011) 1-16.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x

Google Scholar

[7] T. Grünheid, M. S. Lee, B. E. Larson, Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bonding, Angle Orthod. 86(3) (2015) 468-474.

DOI: 10.2319/042415-279.1

Google Scholar

[8] S. Sasamoto, M. Konno, J. Uechi, Y. Yasuda, M. Iijima, I. Mizoguchi, Assessment of the effects of two indirect bonding techniques on the three-dimensional accuracy of bracket positioning, J. Hokkaido Orthod. Soc. 46(1) (2018) 2.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Schmid, D. Brenner, W. Recheis, P. Hofer-Picout, M. Brenner, A. G. Crismani, Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques—an in vitro study with 3D scanned models, Europ. J. Orthod. 40(5) (2018) 549-555.

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy006

Google Scholar

[10] A. E. Castilla, J. J. Crowe, J. R. Moses, M. Wang, J. L. Ferracane, D. A. Covell Jr, Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques, Angle Orthod. 84(4) (2014) 607-614.

DOI: 10.2319/070113-484.1

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Li, L. Mei, J. Wei, X. Yan, X. Zhang, W. Zheng, Y. Li, Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Oral Health, 19(1) (2019) 137.

DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4

Google Scholar