Influence of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction on Fundamental Period for Frame Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

By using of the approximate value of T proposed in FEMA450, the equations of the approximate effective fundamental period are derived for circular mat foundations supported at the surface, embedded foundations of circular shape and embedded foundations of arbitrary shapes, respectively. It is found that the limit values of of Veletsos are not uniform, and excessive for structures with h/r > 9, but too small for embedded deeply foundations. In this paper the uniform limit value of is 1.10 for all structures, and the conditions of consideration of SSI are given for ordinary reinforced concrete frame structures with circular mat foundations supported at the surface, embedded foundations of circular shape, and embedded foundations of arbitrary shapes, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1618-1626

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mylonakis G, Gazetas G. Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental? Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2000; 4(3):227-301.

DOI: 10.1080/13632460009350372

Google Scholar

[2] Veletsos AS, Meek JW. Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1974; 3(2):121-138.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290030203

Google Scholar

[3] Veletsos AS, Nair VV. Seismic interaction of structures on hysteretic foundations. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1975; 101(1):109-129

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0003962

Google Scholar

[4] Bielak J. Dynamic behavior of structures with embedded foundations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1975; 3(3):259-74.

Google Scholar

[5] Setwart JP, Seed RB, and Fenves GL. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings II: empirical findings. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 125(1):38-48.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1999)125:1(38)

Google Scholar

[6] Veletsos A S. Dynamics of structure-foundation systems. Structural and Geotechnical Mechanics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1977.

Google Scholar

[7] Khalil L, Sadek M, Shahrour I. Influence of the soil-structure interaction on the fundatenmal period of buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:2445-2453.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.738

Google Scholar

[8] Building Seismic Safety Council (U. S.), United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency. And National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (U. S.). (2004). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA450), Part 1: Provisions, (2003 ed). Washington, D.C.. Building Seismic Safety Council.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1586085

Google Scholar

[9] Building Seismic Safety Council (U. S.), United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency. And National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (U. S.). (2004). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA450), Part 2: Commentary, (2003 ed). Washington, D.C.. Building Seismic Safety Council.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1586085

Google Scholar