Investigations of the Difference in Dam Break Modeling Approaches between 1-D and 2-D Hydrodynamic Model

Anahita Jouzdani; Abdorreza Kabiri-Samani

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.2423

Paper Titles

The Solution on Problem of Soft Soil Layer’s Collapse in Xin Kailing Tunnel and Evaluations on its Effect
p.2401

Study on Risk Assessment Method of Water Bursting Disaster in Railway Tunnel
p.2408

Research on Water Environment Problem for Landscape Design of Waterfront Districts
p.2414

Analysis for Temperature Field and Stress of Concrete Volute Structure
p.2418

Investigations of the Difference in Dam Break Modeling Approaches between 1-D and 2-D Hydrodynamic Model
p.2423

The Effect of Netting Dissipaters on Increasing the Efficiency of Energy Dissipation in Vertical Drops
p.2427

Comparision between UTM and GRAUSS KRUEGER Projection in NIGERIA Rail Project
p.2431

The Preparation and Research of PVA Embedding Zr-AC Phosphorus Adsorbent
p.2438

Productive Experiment of Combined Process Treating Sewage of Three Gorges Reservoir Region
p.2444

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 90-93Investigations of the Difference in Dam Break...

Investigations of the Difference in Dam Break Modeling Approaches between 1-D and 2-D Hydrodynamic Model

Abstract:

There are different numerical models performed on hydrodynamic behavior of dam break flood in canals and floodplains based on 1D and 2D modeling approaches. In recognition of increasing demand to precise modeling of dam break flood, and due to the limited instructions to choose the best computational model, this article appraises the difference between 1D and 2D modeling of the phenomenon based on the logical comparison of the results. For this purpose the Zayandeh-Rood dam in Iran was used as the case study and MIKE11 and MIKE21 are used for numerical exploration of the problem. The reliability of each approach is assessed and the applicability of each method for exact analyzing the dam break phenomena was demonstrated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering, ICCET 2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 90-93)

Pages:

2423-2426

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.2423

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Anahita Jouzdani, Abdorreza Kabiri-Samani

Keywords:

Dam-Break, Hydrodynamic Modeling, Mike11, Mike21

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] DHI Software: Dam Break Risks, Denmark, 2007.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Jorgeson, X. Ying and W. Wardlaw: Two-Dimensional Modeling Of Dam Reach Flooding., Us-China Workshop On Advanced Computational Modeling In Hydro Science and Engineering, Oxford, Mississippi, USA. (2007)

Google Scholar

[3] F. M. Henderson, Open Channel Flow. Mac Millian Publishing Co., New York. (1966)

Google Scholar

[4] DHI Software: MIKE11, a Modeling System for Rivers and Channels, User Guide, Denmark. (2007)

Google Scholar

[5] DHI Software: Flow Model, Hydrodynamic Module, User Guide, Denmark. (2007)

Google Scholar

[6] Dezab consulting engineers: Hydrology studies determining river bed of the Zayandeh Rood River, Isfahan. (2004)

Google Scholar