Comparison of the Two Decomposition and Coordination Algorithms for Reactive Power Optimization Based on Proximal Center Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming at the two decomposition and coordination reactive power optimization algorithms both of which are based on proximal center algorithm, they are compared in detail in the calculation process, communication and coordination mode and the amount of required communication data in each iteration. Taking the IEEE 118-node system and the IEEE 300-node system as an example, the coefficient matrix, communication and coordination mode and the amount of required communication data in each iteration of the two algorithms are compared and analyzed. The convergence characteristics of the two algorithms are the same, and which algorithm is better depends on the communication and coordination mode is more convenient to apply and you want to select.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1008-1009)

Pages:

404-408

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Zhi, Yang Honggeng. Decomposition and coordination algorithm based on proximal center algorithm for reactive power optimization [J]. Electric power automation equipment, 2012, 32(12): 33-37(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Li Zhi, Yang Honggeng. A full decomposition proximal center algorithm for decomposition and coordination of reactive power optimization [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(1): 77-83(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Cheng Xingong, Li Jiwen, Cao Lixia, et al. Multi-objective distributed parallel reactive power optimization based on subarea division of the power systems [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(10): 110-113(in Chinese).

DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2005.1547063

Google Scholar

[4] Liu Baoying, Yang Rengang. Multi-subarea parallel reactive power optimization based on APP[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(7): 47-51(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Li Zhi, Yang Honggeng. A block coordinate descent-based parallel decomposition-coordination algorithm for reactive power optimization [J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(1): 178-182(in Chinese).

Google Scholar