Modeling of Aging Transformer Failure Rate and the Retirement Timing Decision

Article Preview

Abstract:

When making an updating strategy for aging transformer, both the condition of transformer and the risk effect of its aging on power system needed to be taken into account. Based on the model of aging transformer failure rate by insulation age, a comparative analysis of the risk caused by aging failure within the planned period and the profit from delaying updating was undertaken; then the optimal timing strategy to retire transformer was developed on the basis of a balance between risk and profit. The analysis of examples indicated that the proposed process of the strategy could be applied to plan the retiring time according to both the actual condition of transformer and the impact of the risk to the grid, thus making full use of transformer and allowing the power company to get the maximum benefit.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1008-1009)

Pages:

430-436

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zhang X. Failure Rate Model and Overload Capability of Oil-immersed Transformers. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] Ning L Y, Wu W C, Zhang B M. Analysis of a Time-varying Power Component Outage Model for Operation Risk Assessment. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(16): 7-12.

Google Scholar

[3] He J, Cheng L, Sun Y Z, et al. Condition Dependent Short-term Reliability Models of Transmission Equipment. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(7): 39-46.

Google Scholar

[4] Hughes D. Condition based risk management(CBRM)-enabling asset condition information to be central to corporate decision making/Proceedings of the 18th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, Turin, Italy; IEEE, 2005: 1-5.

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20050884

Google Scholar

[5] Wang H F, Yang H J, He B T, et al. Improvement of State Failure Rate Model for Power Transmission and Transforming Equipment. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(16): 27-31, 43.

Google Scholar

[6] Ning L Y, Wu W C, Zhang B M. Time-varying Transformer Outage Model for Operational Risk Assessment Part One : Condition Based Failure Rate Estimation Method for Transformer Internal L at en t Fau l t Est imat ion. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34(15): 9-13.

Google Scholar

[7] Endrenyi J, Aboresheid S, Allan R, et al. The Present Status of Maintenance Strategies and the Impact of Maintenance on Reliability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(4): 638-646.

DOI: 10.1109/59.962408

Google Scholar

[8] Saha T. K. Review of modern diagnostic techniques for assessing insulation condition in aged transformers. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2003, 10(5): 903-917.

DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2003.1237337

Google Scholar

[9] Baird P J, Herman H, Stevens G C. On-site analysis of transformer paper insulation using portable spectroscopy for chemometric prediction of aged condition. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 2008, 15(4): 1089-1099.

DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2008.4591232

Google Scholar

[10] Pradhan M K, Ramu T S. On the estimation of elapsed life of oil-immersed powertransformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2005, 20(3): 1962-(1969).

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2005.848663

Google Scholar

[11] Jongen R, Gulski E, Morshuis P, et al. Statistical analysis of power transformer component life time data. International Power Engineering Conference, 2007: 1273-1277.

Google Scholar

[12] Li W Y, Zhou J Q, Lu J P, et al. A probabilistic analysis approach to making decision on retirement of aged equipment in transmission systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2007, 22(3): 1891-1896.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2007.899765

Google Scholar

[13] Zang D B. Maintenance and Replacement Strategies of Electric Power Equipment Based on Condition Monitoring and System Risk Evaluation, Chongqing: Chongqing University, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] Li W Y. Evaluating mean life of power system equipment with limited end-of-life failure data. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1): 236-242.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.821434

Google Scholar

[15] Li W Y. Risk Assessment Of Power Systems: Models, Methods, and Applications. USA and Canada: IEEE Press and Wiley & Sons, (2005).

Google Scholar

[16] Jongen R, Gulsli E, Morshuis P, et al. Statistical analysis of power transformer component life time data. International Power Engineering Conference, 2007: 1273-1277.

Google Scholar

[17] Zhou H Y. Chaotic Detection Method on Transformer Oil-dissolved Gas Photoacoustic Signal and Analyzing the Influential Factors, Chongqing: Chongqing University, (2010).

Google Scholar