Suitability Evaluation on Land Reclamation in Hebei Fanshan Phosphate Mine

Article Preview

Abstract:

Suitability evaluation is the important basis for scientifically determining the direction of land reclamation. This paper deeply elaborates the goal of land reclamation and the principles of suitability evaluation. land reclamation direction of the project area is initially determines to be cultivated land, forest land, grassland and garden plot based on region land-use planning and analysis of natural factors, socio-economic factors, policy factors of the mining area; the evaluation index system including five involved factors is constructed, and the suitability evaluation of evaluation units is carried out by the comprehensive index method and extreme conditions. Based on above-mentioned evaluation, the land reclamation direction of 14 evaluation units are ultimately determined by comprehensive analysis of the local natural conditions, social conditions and so on.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1010-1012)

Pages:

1291-1296

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zheng fu Bian, in: China Land Science , Vol. (1) (2001), pp.6-11.

Google Scholar

[2] Xin Zhao, Chang hua Liu, Shi-dong Wang, in: Journal of HENAN Polytechnic University (Natural Science), Vol. 3( 28)(2009), pp.373-377.

Google Scholar

[3] Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center of ministry of Land, in: Land reclamation programming practices (upper volumes ) edited by China Land Press, China, Beijing(2011), in press.

Google Scholar

[4] Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center of ministry of Land, in: Land reclamation programming practices (Lower volumes ) edited by China Land Press, China, Beijing(2011), in press.

Google Scholar

[5] Hong Wang, Qin Zhang, in: Industrial Minerals and Processing, Vol. (6)(2011), pp.44-48.

Google Scholar