Dynamic Resistivity Changes of Diesel Contamination Plume in Simulated Aquifer

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hydrocarbon contamination to subsurface from petroleum spills and underground tank leaking has become more and more concerned. In this study, the vertical migration processes of diesel was simulated in a scaled beach sand aquifer model using a cylinder Plexiglas tank and monitored by self-made automatic resistivity monitoring system. It was shown that the resistivity change curves were dissimilar among unsaturated zone, capillary fringe and saturated zone. Through the measurements of the soil samples, the water content and oil content variability were consistent with the resistivity changes. From the sharp point of resistivity change curves, the thickness of the accumulated oil zone could be estimated. It provides an effective method to dynamically monitor the light oil plume migration in ground aquifer after leaking and determine the location of the oil lens.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1010-1012)

Pages:

1699-1704

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. A. Kamaruddin, W. N. A. Sulaiman, N. A. Rahman, M. P. Zakaria, M. Mustaffar and R. Sa'ari. A Review of Laboratory and Numerical Simulations of Hydrocarbons Migration in Subsurface Environments. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 4(3): 191-214, (2011).

DOI: 10.3923/jest.2011.191.214

Google Scholar

[2] KELLER G V. Engineering applications of electrical geophysical methods [C]. Proceedings of Conference on Subsurface Explorations for Underground Excavation and Heavy Construction, Henniker, New Hampshire, 1974 August 11–16.

Google Scholar

[3] TELFORD W M, GELDART L P, SHERIFF R E, et al. Applied Geophysics [M]. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, (1976).

Google Scholar

[4] GREENHOUSE J P, SLAINE D D. Geophysical modeling and mapping of contaminated groundwater around three waste disposal sites in southern Ontario, Canada [J]. Can. Geotech. J. 1986, 23 (3): 372–384.

DOI: 10.1139/t86-052

Google Scholar

[5] OLHOEFT G R. Direct detection of hydrocarbons and organic chemicals with ground penetrating radar and complex resistivity[C]. Proceedings of the NWWA Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, 1986 November 12–14.

Google Scholar

[6] DANIELS J J, ROBERTS R, VENDL M. Site studies of ground-penetrating radar for monitoring petroleum product contaminants[C]. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems SAGEEP '92, Oakbrook, Illinois, 1992: 597–609.

DOI: 10.4133/1.2921964

Google Scholar

[7] BENSON A K, PAYNE K L, STUBBEN M A. Mapping groundwater contamination using DC resistivity and VLF geophysical methods: a case study[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62 (1): 80–86.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1444148

Google Scholar

[8] DELANEY A J, STRASSER J L, LAWSON D E, et al. Geophysical Investigations at the Poleline Road Disposal Site [R], Fort Richardson, ALASKA. U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), CRREL Report 97-4, Hanover, New Hampshire, (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] ASTLEY B N, SNYDER C F, LAWSON D E, et al. Using ground resistivity and ground-penetrating radar to analyze stratigraphy, aquifer distribution and potential contaminant migration pathways[R]. Water Treatment Plant, Fort Richardson, ALASKA. Final Draft Contract Report. U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Anchorage, ALASKA: (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] SAUCK W A, ESTELLA A A, NASH N S. High conductivities associated with an LNAPL plume imaged by integrated geophysical techniques [J]. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 1998, 2 (3): 203–212.

Google Scholar

[11] SAUCK W A. A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2000, 44(2-3): 151-165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(99)00021-x

Google Scholar

[12] DELANEY A J, PEAPPLES P R, ARCONE S A. Electrical resistivity of frozen and petroleum-contaminated fine-grained soil [J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2001, 32(2-3): 107-119.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-232x(00)00023-9

Google Scholar

[13] GAJDOS V, KRAL V. Influence of hydrocarbon pollution to soil conductivity [C]. In: Bell, R.S. (Ed. ), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP 1995), Orlando, FL, 1995: 785-789.

DOI: 10.4133/1.2922201

Google Scholar

[14] GUO Xiu-jun, WU Rui-suo, JIA Yong-gang, et al. The study of electrical resistivity change of different saturation soils contaminated with oil sewage and the contaminated area detecting [J]. Progress In Geophysics. 2005,(02): 402-406.

Google Scholar

[15] BAI Lan, ZHOU Zhong-hua, ZHANG Hu-yuan, et al. Analysis The Resistivity Characteristics of Contaminated Soil [J]. Environmental Engineering. 2008,(02): 66-70.

Google Scholar

[16] LIU Han-le, ZHOU Qi-you, WU Hua-qiao. Determination of saturation distribution of light non-aqueous phase liquid based on electric resistivity tomography [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2008(02): 189-195.

Google Scholar