Effect of Temperature on Deactivation Force of Three Commercial NiTi Orthodontic Archwires

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the transition temperature range (TTR) and the effect of temperatures at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 °C on the deactivation force of three commercially available NiTi archwires. Materials and methods: Three different brands of NiTi archwires, NiTi OR (Ormco), NiTi GH (G&H) and NiTi H (Highland), with a cross sectional area of 0.016 x 0.022 inch2 were analysed for transformation temperature range (TTR) by using differential scanning calorimeter and load-deflection characteristics using a three-point bending test at temperatures of 10, 20, 30, 37, 40, 50 and 60 °C. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive analysis was used to calculate each variable and Kruskal Wallis test was performed to assess the difference in measurements among the three NiTi wires. P<0.05 was considered as statistical significant. Results: TTR showed austenitic temperature finish (Af) at 24.45 °C for NiTi OR, 27.55 °C for NiTi GH and 51.5 °C for NiTi H. The highest deactivation force was found in NiTi H followed by NiTi OR and NiTi GH at the temperatures below and higher than 37°C. There were siginificant differences (p<0.05) in the deactivation force of NiTi OR - NiTi H and NiTi GH - NiTi H at 10 °C and 20 oC, and NiTi GH – NiTi H and NiTi GH – NiTi OR at 30 °C and 37 °C. However, no significant difference was found among all NiTi wires at 40, 50 and 60 oC, except NiTi GH – NiTi H at 60 oC. A close relationship was found between temperature and unloading curves (deactivaton force); increase in the temperature led to an increase in the plateau of delivery deactivation force and decrease in temperature led to a decrease in the plateau of delivery deactivation force. Conclusion: The TTRs of commercial NiTi archwires are variable, expecially the austenitic finish temperature. The deactivation force increases in higher temperature and decreases in lower temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1025-1026)

Pages:

325-329

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.R. Meling and J. Odegaard: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 119, No. 3 (2001), p.263.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Otsuka, T. Sawamura and K. Shimizu: Phys. Stat. Sol. Vol. 5 (1971), p.457.

Google Scholar

[3] T.V. Philip and P.A. Beck: AIME. J. Metals. Vol. 209 (1957), p.1269.

Google Scholar

[4] R.W. Phillip: Skinner's science of dental materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, (1982).

Google Scholar

[5] T.W. Duerig: And Zadno R. An engineering aspects of shape memory alloys. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, (1990) p.369.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-1009-4.50036-6

Google Scholar

[6] D. Segner: Eur. J. Orthod. Vol. 17, No. 5 (1995), p.395.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Miyasaki, K. Otsuka: ISIJ Int. Vol. 29, No. 5 (1989), p.353.

Google Scholar

[8] S. E Khier, W. A Brantley, R.A. Fournelle: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 99, No. 4 (1991), p.310.

Google Scholar

[9] D.M. Adams, J.M. Powers, K. Asgar: Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 91 (1987), p.131.

Google Scholar

[10] J.A. Gurgel, S. Kerr, J.M. Powers, V. LeCrone: Am. J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 120, No. 4 (2001), p.378.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Yoneyama, H. Doi, H. Hamanaka: J. Biomed Mater. Res. Vol. 27, No. 3 (1993), p.399.

Google Scholar

[12] C.L. Hurst, M.G. Duncanson, R.S. Nanda, P.V. Angolkar: Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. Vol. 98, No. 1 (1990), p.72.

Google Scholar

[14] R.I. Tonner, N.E. Waters: Eur. J. Orthod. Vol. 16, No. 5 (1994), p.409.

Google Scholar

[15] M.P. Filleul, L. Jordan: Eur. J. Orthod Vol. 19, No. 6 (1997), p.637.

Google Scholar