Numerical Analysis of Sheet Metal Forming Limit for Local Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

Generally, the forming limit diagram is widely applied to predict the sheet necking and fracture in the conventional sheet forming process. In recent years, the fact that the forming limit is much higher using Incremental sheet forming (ISF) than that obtained in conventional sheet forming, has become a research hotspot in forming mechanism of local forming process. In this paper, the geometrical imperfection in the thickness was presumed to represent local weakening zone and the BAMMAN_DAMAGE material model which using void to describe non homogenization caused by geometric imperfection, were used respectively to investigate the effect of geometry imperfection on the sheet forming limit. Based on the W.C. Emmens’ experiment, the reason and mechanism of enhancement of forming limit during incremental forming was studied through the numerical simulation method. And the variations of stress and strain during the forming process were also studied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

76-83

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Zhang Qingfeng, Jia Ping, Zhou Xudong, Mu Xin, Fang Shijie. Research development of incremental sheet metal forming. Forging &Stamping Technology Vol. 35/No. 2 (2010), pp.6-12.

Google Scholar

[2] W. C. Emmens, G. Sebastiani, A. H. van den Boogaard. The technology of incremental sheet forming -A brief review of the history. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010), p.981–997.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.014

Google Scholar

[3] Filice C., Fantini L., Micari F. Analysis of material formability in incremental forming. CIRP Annals-manufacturing Technology 51(2002), pp.199-202.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61499-1

Google Scholar

[4] Myoung-Sup Shim, Jong-Jin Park. The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 113 (2001), pp.654-685.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00679-3

Google Scholar

[5] T. J. Kim, D. Y. Yang. Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 42 (2000), pp.1271-1286.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00047-8

Google Scholar

[6] Y. H. Kim, J. J. Park. Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 130-131 (2002), pp.42-46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00788-4

Google Scholar

[7] Li Lei, Zhou Wanlin, Hussain G. Prediction of Single Point Incremental Forming Limit. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 46/No. 18 (2010), pp.102-107.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2010.18.102

Google Scholar

[8] K. Hamilton, J. Jeswiet. Single point incremental forming at high feed rates and rotational speeds: Surface and structural consequences. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 59 (2010), p.311–314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.016

Google Scholar

[9] M. F. Horstemeyer. A Numerical Parametric Investigation of Localization and Forming Limits. Center for Materials an Engineering Sciences MS 9405. Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA 94551-0969.

Google Scholar

[10] John O. Hallquist. LS-DYNA Theory Manual (2006), p.19. 87-19. 89.

Google Scholar

[11] D. J. Bammann, M. L. Chiesa, A. McDonald, W. A. Kawahara, J. J. Dike, V. D. Revelli. Prediction of ductile failure in metal structures. ASME AMD 107 (1990), pp.7-12.

Google Scholar

[12] W.C. Emmensa, A.H. van den Boogaardb. An overview of stabilizing deformation mechanisms in incremental sheet forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009), p.3688–3695.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.003

Google Scholar

[13] Rajiv Malhotra, Liang Xue, Ted Belytschko, Jian Cao. Mechanics of fracture in single point incremental forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 212 (2012), pp.1573-1590.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.02.021

Google Scholar