The Degrees of Freedom for MIMO Interference Broadcast Channels with no CSIT

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) interference broadcast channel (IBC) plays an important role in the modern wireless communications. The upper bound of degree of freedom (DoF) and corresponding achievable schemes have been investigated. However, all the achievable schemes require perfect channel state information at transmitters (CSIT). In the absence of CSIT, the DoF value is still unknown. This paper mainly focuses on the G-cell K-user MIMO IBC, where there are M antennas at each transmitter and N antennas at each receiver. The transmitters only know channel coherent time internals rather than the values of channel coefficients. The users in the same cell are assumed to be able to share the channel information. Based on a heterogeneous block fading model, a blind interference alignment (IA) scheme is proposed for this scenario. We show that when and , then a total of degrees of freedom (DoF) can be achieved. The inner bound is same with the decomposition DoF upper bound.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1049-1050)

Pages:

1776-1780

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] 3GPP TR 36. 814 V9. 0. 0. Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects (release 9). Oct. (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] V. Annapureddy, V. Veeravalli, V. Gaussian, Interference networks: Sum capacity in the low-interference regime and new outer bounds on the capacity region, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(2009) 3032-3050.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2009.2021380

Google Scholar

[3] A. Host-Madsen, A. Nosratinia, The multiplexing gain of wireless networks. 2005 IEEE Proceedings International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), Sep. 4-9, 2005, Adelaide, SA: 2005, 2065-(2069).

DOI: 10.1109/isit.2005.1523709

Google Scholar

[4] G. Sridharan, W. Yu, Degrees of freedom of MIMO cellular networks with two cells and two users per cell, 2013 IEEE Proceedings International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), July 7-12, 2013, Istanbul: 2013, 1774-1778.

DOI: 10.1109/isit.2013.6620532

Google Scholar

[5] J. Sun, Y. Liu, G. Zhu, On the degrees of freedom of the cellular network, 2010 IEEE International Conference on in Communications (ICC), May 23-27, 2010, Cape Town: 2010, 1-5.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Park, I. Lee, Degrees of freedom of multiple broadcast channels in the presence of inter-cell interference, IEEE Transaction on Communications, 2011, 59(5): 1481-1487.

DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2011.031611.090428

Google Scholar

[7] T. Liu, C. Yang, On the Feasibility of Linear Interference Alignment for MIMO Interference Broadcast Channels With Constant Coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(9): 2178-2191.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.2248005

Google Scholar

[8] T. Liu T, C. Yang, Genie Chain and Degrees of Freedom of Symmetric MIMO Interference Broadcast Channels. Available: http: /arxiv. org/abs/1309. 6727 (9, 2013).

Google Scholar

[9] S. Jafar, Exploiting channel correlations-Simple interference alignment schemes with no CSIT. Available: http: /arxiv. org/abs/0910. 0555v1 (10, 2009).

DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2010.5683592

Google Scholar

[10] T. Gou, C. Wang, S. Jafar, Aiming Perfectly in the Dark-Blind Interference Alignment Through Staggered Antenna Switching. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(6): 2734-2744.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2011.2129517

Google Scholar

[11] C. Wang, T. Gou, S. Jafar, Interference alignment through staggered antenna switching for MIMO BC with no CSIT, 2010 Conference Record of the Forty Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 7-10, 2010, Pacific Grove, CA: 2010, 2081-(2085).

DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2010.5757915

Google Scholar

[12] S. Jafar, Blind Interference Alignment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2012, 6(3): 216-227.

DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2012.2187877

Google Scholar