A Study of an Administrative System for High Risk Operations-Take a Science Park as an Example

Abstract:

Since the establishment of science park in Taiwan, the production categories of stationed plants are diversified and most of their operations are in the high risk field. Due to various production categories, the disaster preventions for high risk operations are variable, some are difficult and some are easy.Thus, it makes the disaster preventions difficult in the science park; it needs desperately the stationed factories to carry out a systematic, automatic and strict control method to indeed prevent disasters. It is also the highest standard for the plant operations to achieve a construction worry-free working site but it is still the target for the stationed factories on the science park to work on placing the work safety in the standard operation procedure. Based upon the administration circulation concept, this study proposed the administrative system for the high risk operations to be used on the science park, and this system is divided into four stages which include plan, execution, examination, and correction. Moreover, it also takes a science park as an example to exhibit the execution result of this system which could be referred to by other science parkin performing the administration of high risk operations.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1051)
• Pages: 1051-1060
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1051.1051
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Chao Fu Lee*, Kuang Hua Hsu, Li Hua Lee
• Keywords: Disaster Prevention, High Risk Operations, Risk Assessment, Standard Operation Procedure

References

[1] The comparison table of the announcement of the 5th amendment of order 9 of the file Lao-An-1-Tzu-Ti No. 0970145020, dated of Jan. 9, 2008, the Labor Committee of Executive Yuan.

[2] A letter of the file Lao-An-1-Tzu-Ti No. 0960145500, dated of Aug. 13, 2007, the guidance of the vocational safety and health administration system in Taiwan, theLabor Committee of Executive Yuan.

[3] The general information for the verification specification of the vocational safety and health administration system in Taiwan, the Labor Committee of Executive Yuan.

[4] The general information for the guidance outline of the vocational safety and health administration system in Taiwan, the Labor Committee of Executive Yuan, date in December (2007).

[5] Su, H.Y., Chung, S.H., 2001. the study of the auditing system and performance assessment of the safety and health of business. the graduate school of labor safety and health, IOSH90-S106.

[6] Leveson, N., 2004. New accident model for engineering safer system. Safety Science 42, 237-270.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x

[7] Lundberg J., Rollenhagen C., HollnagelE., 2009. What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find – The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals, Safety Science.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.01.004

[8] Coze, J.L., 2008. Disasters and organisations: From lessons learnt to theorizing. Safety Science 46, 132–149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.12.001

[9] Queensland Government, 2005. Occupational health and safety audit, Astralia. (http: /www. dir. qld. gov. au).

[10] OSHA, 2005. Auditing safety, workers compensation, and injury management system, NCOSS Occupational Health Safety Project (OHS). USA. (www. ncoss. org. au/ohs).

[11] Worksafe Victoria, 2002. Auditing health and safety management system, 4thed, Victorian.

[12] WorkCover Authority, ISBN 0759431027 Astralia.