Analysis of Micro-Texture and Grain Size Distributions in Machined Aluminum Alloy 7075

Article Preview

Abstract:

the effects of turning on the gradients of micro-texture and grain size of Al alloy 7075 processed by turning is studied. Analytical models based on Boussinesq equation and stress/force transformation, predict that the equivalent von-Mises stress penetrate almost 1 mm below the machined surface with a maximum of 1400 MPa. The induced temperature below the surface is and reaches up to 240°C. As a result of deformation below the machined surface, the grains below the surface show a preferred grain shape orientation different from the grains in the central region. The normalized population of (121) plane increases at the machined surface compared to the central part of the sample. Orientation distribution functions reveal that at the central part of the sample, the material is mostly randomly oriented and the closest texture component is the recrystallized texture. On the other hand, the strongest texture attribute at the machined surface is β-fiber torsion. The average grain size shows a 10% decreases moving away from center while below the machined surface there is a 50% increase in the average grain size. This can be due to the grain growth caused by higher temperatures right below the machining tool. The reported results provide a toolset to determine the final properties of the material after machining in addition to providing means to more accurately describing the machining mechanics.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

489-494

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] O. Fergani, S.Y. Liang, Manufacturing Letters, Vol. 1 (2013) pp.74-77.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Rotella, O.W. Dillon Jr, D. Umbrello, L. Settineri, I.S. Jawahir, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 15 (2013) pp.87-95.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.005

Google Scholar

[3] T. Sakai, H. Miura, A. Goloborodko, O. Sitdikov, Acta Materialia, Vol. 57 (2009) pp.153-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.001

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Horita, T. Fujinami, T.G. Langdon, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 318 (2001) pp.34-41.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Simoneau, E. Ng, M.A. Elbestawi, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 56 (2007) pp.57-60.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Hurley, P. Hodgson, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 302 (2001) pp.206-214.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Agnew, J. Horton, T. Lillo, D. Brown, Scripta Materialia, Vol. 50 (2004) pp.377-381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.006

Google Scholar

[8] I.J. Beyerlein, L.S. Tóth, Progress in Materials Science, Vol. 54 (2009) pp.427-510.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Ding, Y.C. Shin, Proceedings of the 2011 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, MSEC2011-50220, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Corvallis, OR, USA, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] S.C. Baik, Y. Estrin, H.S. Kim, R.J. Hellmig, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 351 (2003) pp.86-97.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Courbon, T. Mabrouki, J. Rech, D. Mazuyer, F. Perrard, E. D'Eramo, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 8 (2013) pp.515-520.

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Miao, L. Hu, X. Wang, E. Wang, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 493 (2010) pp.87-90.

Google Scholar

[13] U.F. Kocks, C.N. Tomé, H. -R. Wenk, Texture and anisotropy: preferred orientations in polycrystals and their effect on materials properties, Cambridge university press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Liang, J. -C. Su, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 56 (2007) pp.65-68.

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Karpat, T. Özel, Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, Vol. 128 (2006) pp.435-444.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Rollett, F. Humphreys, G.S. Rohrer, M. Hatherly, Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, Elsevier, (2004).

Google Scholar