Correlation Analysis of Liquefaction Characteristic Parameters with Liquefaction Based on Real Testing Data

Article Preview

Abstract:

Through collecting real liquefaction in-situ data available worldwide, the correlations of influencing characteristics parameters such as PGA, water table depth, buried depth of sandy layer, SPT counts and shear wave velocity with respect to liquefaction were analyzed by means of Pearson correlation method. The correlative performance of the characteristic parameters with liquefaction was comparatively analyzed under conditions of varying buried depths, water tables and seismic intensities. The real correlations of the characteristic parameters with liquefaction were obtained corresponding to real dynamic loading, real buried condition and in-situ testing data. The analytical results show that water table, buried depth of sandy layer, SPT and shear wave velocity keep negative correlations with respect to liquefaction while correlation of PGA with liquefaction was positive. The correlations of buried depth of sandy layer, SPT were remarkable while the correlations of water table, shear wave velocity were weak. The correlation coefficient of SPT was the largest, followed by buried depth of sandy layer, PGA and water table; and the correlation coefficient of shear wave velocity was the smallest. The results presented herein can be used for updating the liquefaction evaluation methods in the codes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1065-1069)

Pages:

292-295

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] National Standards of China. Code for seismic desinggn of buildings (China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing 2010).

Google Scholar

[2] X. YUAN, Z. CAO: China Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 47 (2014), pp.99-108.

Google Scholar

[3] T.L. Youd, I.M. Idriss. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, Vol. 127 (2001), pp.297-313.

Google Scholar

[4] X. YUAN, Z. CAO. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 33 (2011), pp.509-519.

Google Scholar

[5] Z. SHI, S. YU, W. FENG. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 15 (1993), pp.74-80.

Google Scholar

[6] I. M. Idriss, R.M. Boulanger. In: Report for Center for Geotechnical Modeling Department of Civil Environmental Engineering (No. UCD/CGM-10-02), University of California, Davis, California (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] LIU Huixian (Editor). The great Tangshan earthquake 1976 [M]. Beijing: Seismic Press, (1989).

Google Scholar

[8] Institute of Engineering Mechanics. Seismic damage in Haicheng earthquake [M]. Beijing: Seismic Press, (1979).

Google Scholar

[9] W. WANG. Study on liquefaction characteristics and liquefaction-influencing factors assessment. PhD Dissertation in Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Haribn (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] R.E. Moss, R.B. Seed, R.E. Kayen, et al. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 132(2006), pp.1032-1051.

Google Scholar

[11] D. A. Ronald, K. H. Stokoe. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126(2000), pp.1015-1025.

Google Scholar

[12] K.O. Cetin, Seed R B, D. Kiureghian, et al. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130(2004), pp.1314-1340.

Google Scholar