Typical Defects Sample Selection Methods Research for Electric Power Information System

Abstract:

The existing sample selection methods are inadequate in the determination of defect sample set, and lacking necessary metrics or evaluation methods of the defect sample set. This paper determines the typical defect sample set according to the selecting principles and proposes a metrics method of defect sample set to measure whether the defect sample set is representative of the defect library. At present, defect sample selection mainly depends on brainstorming and expert experiences in the electric system. However, for those organizations which have no experiences orfor large databases, there are significant difficulties on sample selection. The proposed defect sample selection framework and measurement criteria can effectively improve the situation and ensure that the selected sample set can well represent the defect library.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1070-1072)
• Pages: 2101-2107
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1070-1072.2101
• Online since: December 2014
• Authors: Xin Ji, Xin Shi, Qian Li, Da Hua Zhang, De Yue Men
• Keywords: Defect Metric, Defects Sample, Power Information System, Sample Selection

References

[1] Chencai Liang, Daiyu Zhang, Haijing Lin. The comprehensive research of software defects [J]. Computer Engineering, 2006, (19).

[2] Yang He, Hongtao Li, Kai Zhang. The selection method of photoelectric measurement equipment testability verification test sample based on the effect [J]. Modern Electronic Technology, 2014, (3): 31-34.

[3] Junyou Shi. Research about testability test sample selection method [D]. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2004).

[4] Ting Lei, Based on the defect classification and defect prediction software defect prevention , Computer Engineering and Design, vol. 1, (2013).

[5] Lei Wang, Zhenyu Zhu, The CMM key process areas anatomy: defect prevention, Technology Squarevol. 5, (2010).

[6] FangxingLv, The analysis of software defect prevention research, Science and Technology Information vol. 15, (2012).

[7] DonggeHou, Hong Hou, Kegang Zheng, Software process improvement based on defect prevention , Computer Technology and Development vol. 7, (2008).

[8] Yi Luo, Jingjing Zhang, Research of software defect management , China Water Transport, vol. 9, pp.130-131, (2009).

[9] Hai Liu, Kegang Zheng, Software defect cause analysis method, computer science, vol. 36, pp.242-243, (2009).

[10] Wenhao Zhang, Jian Cao, The methods and process of software defect prediction, computer engineering, vol. 30, pp.23-24, (2004).

[11] A. F. Q. Huang, B. B. Lin, and C. B. Huang, A Taxonomy System to Identify Human Error Causes for Software Defects, in Proceedings 18th Issat International Conference on Reliability & Quality in Design, Piscataway, 2012, pp.44-49.

[12] Fanjin Mai, Dongppu Li, Xiaoguang Yue. Based on the bidirectional matching method and the feature selection algorithms of Chinese word segmentation technology research[J]. Journal of kunming university of science and technology(Natural Sciences), 2011, (1).

[13] Sun M.S. and Benjamin K. T. 1995. Ambiguity resolution in Chinese word segmentation. Proceedings of the 10th Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 121-126. Hong Kong.

[14] C. L. Jones, A process-integrated approach to defect prevention, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 24, pp.150-167, (1985).

DOI: 10.1147/sj.242.0150

[15] D. N. Card, Myths and Strategies of Defect Causal Analysis, in Proc. Twenty-Fourth Ann. Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, 2006, pp.469-474.