Risk Assessment of Substation Main Connection Based on LCC Management

Article Preview

Abstract:

Life-cycle cost management is the foundation and techniques for life-cycle cost management. Petri nets has a graphical expression, can improve and add more features and information to Fault tree analysis, Markov equations and so on, raising the speed and accuracy of the entire system of risk assessment. The paper propose a risk assessment based on the life-cycle management approach, establish four state model to analysis transformer substation main wiring operation, discuss elements occurring planned maintenance events and breaker tripping phenomenon, and propose using the basic equations of Petri nets to determine system status and calculate the corresponding probabilities, quantitative analysis of the outage costs of the substation main connection off for running, and seek the best value under the run. In the example discussing and calculating the risk indicators of outage costs for different wiring schemes, the results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed algorithm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1070-1072)

Pages:

956-960

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Y. Xiong: The electrical part of power plant (China Electric Power Press, Beijing 2009).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Q. Shuai: Electric power enterprise asset life-cycle management theory, method and application (China Electric Power Press, Beijing 2010).

Google Scholar

[3] J. L. Wang, L. Xia, Z. G. Wu, et al: Power System Protection and Control Vol 38(2010): 210-216.

Google Scholar

[4] C. X. Guo, J. X. You, M. W. Peng, et al: Transactions of china electrotechnical society Vol 25(2010): 183-189.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Y. Ye, X. R. Wang, S. Zhou, et al: Transactions of china electrotechnical society Vol 27(2012): 168-174.

Google Scholar