The Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Evaluation of Public Infrastructure Projects - The Case of the Subway of Potenza

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present work the economic feasibility of a project of public infrastructure, the expansion of the subway of the city Potenza, is estimated. The assessment has been developed through the application of the Cost-Benefit Analysis. As is known the advantage of this technique is the ability to express in monetary terms the externalities (positive and negative) generated by the project. In this case, the external cost savings related to the improvement of the mobility in the city have been internalized. The research has shown that the valuation of the externalities can be an effective way to manage the planning of new public transport infrastructure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1073-1076)

Pages:

1362-1367

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http: /www. istat. it/it/archivio/93269.

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /ec. europa. eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide02_it. pdf.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Nijkamp and E. Verhoef, in: The Full Costs and Benefits of Transportation edited by D. Greene, D. Jones and M. Delucchi, Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1997), p.387.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Litman: Full cost accounting of urban transportation: implications and tools, Cities, Vol. 14 (Transport: Counting the Costs), No. 3 (1997), pp.169-174.

DOI: 10.1016/s0264-2751(97)00057-7

Google Scholar

[5] Information onhttp: /ec. europa. eu/transport/costs/handbook/doc/2008_01_15_handbook_external_cost_en. pdf.

Google Scholar

[6] H.P. van Essen, B.H. Boon, M. Maibach and C. Schreyer, Methodologies For External Cost Estimates And Internalization Scenarios: Discussion Paper For The Workshop On Internalisation On March 15, 2007, CE Delft (www. ce. nl); Information on www. ce. nl/4288_Inputpaper. pdf (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Banister and Y. Berechman: Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth, Journal of Transport Geography Vol. 9, Issue 3 (2001), pp.209-218.

DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6923(01)00013-8

Google Scholar

[8] A.J. Venables: Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 41, No. 2(2007), pp.173-188.

Google Scholar

[9] D.G. Chatman and R.B. Noland: Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research, Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 31, Issue 6 (2011), pp.725-742.

DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2011.587908

Google Scholar

[10] S. Gibbons and S. Machin: Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: evidence from house prices, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 24, Issue1 (2008), pp.99-119.

DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grn008

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. aci. it/i-servizi/servizi-online/costi-chilometrici.

Google Scholar

[12] Information onhttp: /www. scotland. gov. uk/Publications/2006/11/01103351/0(2007).

Google Scholar

[13] B. Manganelli: Real Estate Investing, Springer, Berlin (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] J. Eliasson, M. Lundberg: Do Cost–Benefit Analyses Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Experiences from the Swedish Transport Investment Plan 2010–21, Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 32, Issue 1(2012).

DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2011.582541

Google Scholar

[15] A. Tudela, N. Akiki and R. Cisternas: Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: An application to urban transport investments, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40, Issue 5 (2006), pp.414-423.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.002

Google Scholar

[16] B. Manganelli: Economic feasibility of a biogas cogeneration plant fueled with biogasfrom animal waste, Advanced Materials Research , Vols. 864-867 (2014), pp.451-455.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.864-867.451

Google Scholar

[17] H. Morisugi: Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in Japan, Transport Policy, Vol. 7, Issue 1 (2000), pp.35-40.

DOI: 10.1016/s0967-070x(00)00013-5

Google Scholar