Sensitivity Analysis of the Wall Shear Model to the Correlations for Frequency and Slug Holdup in the Gas-Liquid Slug Flow in Pipes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The one-dimensional mixture model efficiently predicts gas-liquid flows dominated by gravity force. The advantages of the mixture model are the absence of interfacial terms and the reduced number of transport equations, but its weakness lies on the constitutive laws to predict the wall shear force of a gas-liquid mixture. The objective of this work is to realize a sensitivity analysis of the wall shear model (based on the intermittent behavior of the gas and liquid structures) to the correlations for frequency and slug holdup in the one-dimensional, steady state mixture model applied to an isothermal gas-liquid mixture flowing in the slug regime. The numerical results for the pressure gradient obtained here are compared against experimental data from previous work.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

61-67

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.A. Ribeiro, A.S. Reis, P.S. Avendaño, C.H. Ataíde, Marcos A.S. Barrozo, Experimental and CFD simulation of a bubble column, Mater. Sci. Forum 727-728 (2012) 1824-1829.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.727-728.1824

Google Scholar

[2] Meng Lei Wang, Zhe Tian, Kui Xing Liu, Research on influence factors of cooling tower performance, Adv. Mater. Research 280 (2011) 119-123.

Google Scholar

[3] Ji You Fei, Qi Chao Guo, Hua Li, Ran Deng, Study on the intervascular two-phase flow characters of horizontal-tube falling film evaporator, Adv. Mater. Research 516-517 (2012) 208-211.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.516-517.208

Google Scholar

[4] Barry J. Azzopardi, Gas-Liquid Flows, Begell House, New York, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] Donald A. Drew, Stephen L. Passman, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, Springer, New York, (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] Mikko Manninen, Veikko Taivassalo, Sirpa Kallio, On the mixture model for multiphase flow, VTT Publications, Espoo, Finland, 1996, pp.1-67.

Google Scholar

[7] Luiz E.M. Lima, Analysis of mixture model applied in gas-liquid isothermals flows, Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Zuber, J.A. Findlay, Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems, J. Heat Transf. 87 (1965) 453-468.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3689137

Google Scholar

[9] C. Pauchon, H. Dhulesia, D. Lopez, J. Fabre, TACITE: A comprehensive mechanistic model for two-phase flow, in: A. Wilson (Ed. ), 6th International Conference on Multi Phase Production, BHR Group Limited, Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd, Cannes, France, 1993, pp.29-50.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Taitel, D. Barnea, Two-phase slug flow, in: Advances in Heat Transfer, v. 20, Elsevier, San Diego, California, USA, 1990, pp.83-132.

DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2717(08)70026-1

Google Scholar

[11] G.A. Gregory, M.K. Nicholson, K. Aziz, Correlation of the liquid volume fraction in the slug for horizontal gas-liquid slug flow, Int. J. of Multiphase Flow 4 (1978) 33-39.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(78)90023-x

Google Scholar

[12] D. Malnes, Slug flow in vertical, horizontal an inclined pipe, Technical Report, Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway, 1982, ReportIFE/KR/E-83/002.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Barnea, N. Brauner, Holdup of the liquid slug in two phase intermittent flow, Int. J. of Multiphase Flow 11 (1985) 43-49.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(85)90004-7

Google Scholar

[14] R. Marcano, X.T. Chen, C. Sarica, J.P. Brill, A study of slug characteristics for two-phase horizontal flow, in: International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Mexico, (1998).

DOI: 10.2118/39856-ms

Google Scholar

[15] L.E. Gomez, O. Shoham, Y. Taitel, Prediction of slug liquid holdup: horizontal to upward vertical flow, Int. J. of Multiphase Flow 26 (2000) 517-521.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-9322(99)00025-7

Google Scholar

[16] G.A. Gregory, D.S. Scott, Correlation of liquid slug velocity and frequency in horizontal cocurrent gas-liquid slug flow, AIChE J. 15 (1969) 933-935.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690150623

Google Scholar

[17] E.J. Greskovich, A.L. Shrier, Slug frequency in horizontal gas-liquid slug flow, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 11 (1972) 317-318.

DOI: 10.1021/i260042a030

Google Scholar

[18] N.I. Heywood, J.F. Richardson, Slug flow of air-water mixtures in a horizontal pipe: determination of liquid holdup by γ-ray absorption, Chem. Eng. Sci. 34 (1979) 17-30.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(79)85174-x

Google Scholar

[19] G. Zabaras, Prediction of slug frequency for gas/liquid flows, Society of Petroleum Engineers J. 5 (2000) 252-258, 65093-PA.

DOI: 10.2118/65093-pa

Google Scholar

[20] T. Sakaguchi, Correlations for large bubble length, liquid slug length, slug unit length and slug period of gas-liquid two-phase slug flow in vertical pipes, in: E.E. Michaelides (Ed. ), Proceedings of 4th International Conference of Multiphase Flow, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(93)90046-w

Google Scholar