Screening of Factors Affecting Pre-Treatment by Ammonia-N Removal from Poultry Manure Wastewater by Using Soil Water to Improve Biogas Production

Abstract:

In this study, best pre-treatment condition of poultry manure wastewater (PMW) was determined from factorial analysis for the purpose of improving biogas production. Five factors were chosen for factorial screening namely: agitation (0 or 200 rpm), reaction time (2 to 5 hours), type of soil (peat soil or poultry farm soil), soil to water ratio (1:1 or 1:4) and PMW to soil water (SW) ratio (1:4 or 2:3). Based on the result, agitation gave highest contribution in pre-treatment of PMW at 38.36% followed by PMW to SW ratio at 29.76% contribution. In term of interaction, agitation and reaction gave the highest contribution to pre-treatment of PMW at 3.33% contribution. The best pre-treatment condition suggested by Design Expert software was using peat soil as source of soil at SW ratio of 1:6, and mixed with PMW at 1:4 ratio without agitation for 5 hours reaction time. Application of this best pre-treatment condition showed improvement in biogas yield by 82 % from 0.0045 L/g COD using untreated PMW to 0.0248 L/g COD using treated PMW.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 1107)
• Pages: 359-364
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1107.359
• Online since: June 2015
• Authors: Nina Farhana Mohd Jamaludin*, Norazwina Zainol
• Keywords: Ammonia-N Removal, Biogas Production, Design Expert, Poultry Manure Wastewater, Soil Mixed Culture, Two-Level Factorial Design

References

[1] Information on http: /www. dvs. gov. my/en.

[2] G.G. Gungor-Demirci, and G.N. Demirer, Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure, Bioresour. Technol. 93 (2004) 109-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.019

[3] F. Abouelenien, W. Fujuwara, Y. Namba, M. Kosseva, Nishio, and Y. Nakashimada, Improved methane fermentation of methane manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle, Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2010) 6368-6373.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.071

[4] E. Salminen, and J. Rintala, Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste-a review, Bioresour. Technol. 83 (2002) 13-26.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00199-7

[5] Y. Chen, J.J. Cheng, and K.S. Creamer, Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 4044-4064.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057

[6] H.B. Nielsen, and I. Angelidaki, Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 7995-8001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.049

[7] P.H. Liao, A. Chen, and K.V. Lo, Removal of nitrogen from swine manure wastewater by ammonia stripping, Bioresour. Technol. 54 (1995) 17–20.

DOI: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00105-0

[8] N.I. Krylova, R.E. Khabiboulline, R.P. Naummova, and M.A. Nagel, The influence of ammonium and methods for removal during the anaerobic treatment of poultry manure, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 70 (1997) 99-105.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199709)70:1<99::aid-jctb684>3.0.co;2-c

[9] Information on http: /www. ianrpubs. unl. edu/epublic.

[10] M.F. Jamaludin, and N. Zainol, Isolation and Identification of Acetic Acid Producer from Mixed Culture of Soil and Banana Stem Waste in Anaerobic Condition. Inter. Jour of Chem. and Environ. Eng. (2011).

[11] L.O. Santos, R.M. Alegre, C. Garcia-Diego, and J. Cuellar, Effects of magnetic fields on biomass and glutathione production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Process Biochem. 45 (2010) 1362-1367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.05.008

[12] Z.G. Liu, X.F. Zhou, Y.L. Zhang, and H.G. Zhu, Enhanced anaerobic treatment of CSTR-digested effluent from poultry manure: the effect of ammonia inhibition, Waste Manage. 32 (2012) 137-143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.015

[13] T. Liu, and S. Sung, Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic aceticlastic methanogens, Water Sci. Technol. 45 (2002) 113–120.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0304

[14] J. Lobos, C. Wisniewski, M. Heran, and A. Grasmick, Sequencing versus continuous membrane bioreactors: effect of substrate to biomass ratio (F/M) on process performance, J. Membr. Sci. 317 (2008) 71-77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.08.041

[15] Information on http: /cru. cahe. wsu. edu/CEPublications/eb1475/eb1475.

[16] K. Yetilmezsoy, and Z. Sapci-Zengin, Recovery of ammonium nitrogen from the effluent of UASB treating poultry manure wastewater by MAP precipitation as a slow release fertilizer, J. Hazard. Mater. 166 (2009) 260-269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.025

[17] F. Abouelenien, Y. Nakashimada, and N. Nishio, Dry mesophillic fermentation of chicken manure for production of methane by repeated batch culture, J. Biosc. and Bioeng. 3 (2009) 293-295.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.10.009