The Effect of External Voltage on Pulsed Electrohydrodynamic Printing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Picoliter or femtoliter droplets generated with high frequency is very useful for many applications in different valuable fields, such as microarray generation, drug delivery or biochips. Pulsed electrohydrodynamic inkjet printing (Pulsed EHDP) is an advanced technology which is used for generating fine droplets in recent years. Apparently, the deposition frequency of droplets is a key parameter, and it is influenced by various factors. In this paper, the effect of duty cycle and voltage frequency on deposition frequency is investigated in the pulsation mode. A simple scaling law is proposed to demonstrate relationships between these two parameters and deposition frequency. Results show that volume of the liquid accumulated at the apex of the nozzle changes during the non-electric field period, which affects taylor cone deformation time and deposition frequency. High deposition frequency can be achieved by increasing the duty cycle up to 0.7, and choosing voltage frequency between 10Hz to 40Hz. These analysis is valuable for understanding Pulsed EHDP deeply and fabricating the micro/nanoapplications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1120-1121)

Pages:

1339-1344

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Alexander M S, Paine M D, Stark J P W. Pulsation modes and the effect of applied voltage on current and flow rate in nanoelectrospray[J]. Analytical chemistry, 2006, 78(8): 2658-2664.

DOI: 10.1021/ac0520036

Google Scholar

[2] Jain K K. Applications of biochip and microarray systems in pharmacogenomics[J]. Pharmacogenomics, 2000, 1(3): 289-307.

DOI: 10.1517/14622416.1.3.289

Google Scholar

[3] Lee K B, Park S J, Mirkin C A, et al. Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography[J]. Science, 2002, 295(5560): 1702-1705.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1067172

Google Scholar

[4] Serra P, Colina M, Fernández-Pradas J M, et al. Preparation of functional DNA microarrays through laser-induced forward transfer[J]. Applied physics letters, 2004, 85(9): 1639-1641.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1787614

Google Scholar

[5] Juraschek R, Röllgen F W. Pulsation phenomena during electrospray ionization[J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 1998, 177(1): 1-15.

DOI: 10.1016/s1387-3806(98)14025-3

Google Scholar

[6] Paine M D, Alexander M S, Smith K L, et al. Controlled electrospray pulsation for deposition of femtoliter fluid droplets onto surfaces[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 38(3): 315-324.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.12.004

Google Scholar

[7] Alexander M S, Paine M D, Stark J P W. Pulsation modes and the effect of applied voltage on current and flow rate in nanoelectrospray[J]. Analytical chemistry, 2006, 78(8): 2658-2664.

DOI: 10.1021/ac0520036

Google Scholar

[8] Paine M D, Alexander M S, Stark J P W. Nozzle and liquid effects on the spray modes in nanoelectrospray[J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2007, 305(1): 111-123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.031

Google Scholar

[9] Paine M D. Transient electrospray behaviour following high voltage switching[J]. Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2009, 6(6): 775-783.

DOI: 10.1007/s10404-008-0350-0

Google Scholar

[10] Deng W, Gomez A. Full transient response of Taylor cones to a step change in electric field[J]. Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2012, 12(1-4): 383-393.

DOI: 10.1007/s10404-011-0882-6

Google Scholar

[11] Marginean I, Nemes P, Parvin L, et al. How much charge is there on a pulsating Taylor cone?[J]. Applied physics letters, 2006, 89(6): 064104.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2266889

Google Scholar