Using Simulated Data to Support the Calibration Process of ED-XRF Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the general practice of ED-XRF measurements, the values of elemental concentrations are derived from complicated calculation methods. Hereby a simple mathematical formula is suggested, which provides an easy way to prepare standard samples. On the other hand, the simulation of spectral lines may also be a helpful tool for the calibration process. In this study, measured and simulated data were used for the quantitative analysis of ternary Au-Ag-Cu alloys. To determine the calibration points, the peak intensity ratio method was applied and the calibration curves were fitted. This work presents the results of a twofold investigation aimed at: a) finding a suitable computational tool to optimise the parameters of the underlying equations and b) testing the reliability of the simulated data to determine the concentrations of multi-element standard samples. Based on comparisons of calculated concentrations it can be stated that a simple calculation method with simulated data provides an easy tool to define calibration standards. It is also demonstrated that the parameters of the linear plots can be optimised to yield improved results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1120-1121)

Pages:

1435-1440

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Reilly, XRF for film thickness measurement: Pros vs. cons of common configurations: Choosing a benchtop or a hand-held X-ray fluorescence machine often boils down to user's specific needs, Metal Finishing 104 (2006) 20-24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0576(06)80360-0

Google Scholar

[2] R.P. Alvarez, A. Markowicz, D. Wegrzynek, E.C. Cano, S.A. Bamford, D.H. Torres, Quality management and method Validation in EDXRF analysis, X-Ray Spectrom. 36 (2007) 27-34.

DOI: 10.1002/xrs.923

Google Scholar

[3] A. Tomoya, Analytical precision and accuracy in X-ray fluorescence analysis, The Rigaku Journal 21 (2004) 26-38.

Google Scholar

[4] J.W. Criss, L.S. Birks, Calculation methods for fluorescent x-ray spectrometry. Empirical coefficients versus fundamental parameters, Analytical Chemistry 40 (1968) 1080-1086.

DOI: 10.1021/ac60263a023

Google Scholar

[5] R.M. Rousseau, Fundamental algorithm between concentration and intensity in XRF analysis, X-Ray Spectrom. 13 (1984) 121-125.

DOI: 10.1002/xrs.1300130307

Google Scholar

[6] R. Gullayanon, A calibration methodology for energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence measurements based upon synthetically generated reference spectra, PhD dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Milazzo, C. Cicardi, Simple Methods for Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Ancient Metal Objects of Archaeological Interest, X-Ray Spectrom. 26 (1997) 211-216.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4539(199707)26:4<211::aid-xrs214>3.0.co;2-g

Google Scholar

[8] Zs. Sándor, S. Tölgyesi, I. Gresits, M. Káplán-Juhász, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Medieval Silver Coins by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Method, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 246 (2000) 385-389.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1006755414703

Google Scholar

[9] N. Ritchie, J.M. Davis, D.E. Newbury, DTSA-II: A New Tool for Simulating and Quantifying EDS Spectra - Application to Difficult Overlaps, Microscopy and Microanalysis, 14 (2008) 1176-1177.

DOI: 10.1017/s143192760808361x

Google Scholar

[10] R. Leardi, Genetic algorithms in chemistry, J. of Chromatography A. 1158 (2007) 226-233.

Google Scholar

[11] J.H. Holland, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, The University of Michigan Press, Michigan (1975).

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. cstl. nist. gov/div837/837. 02/epq/dtsa2.

Google Scholar

[13] Zs. Sándor, I. Gresits, M. Káplán-Juhász, X-ray fluorescence analysis of medieval gold coins and jewellery, J. of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 256 (2003) 283-288.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1006755414703

Google Scholar