Case Study on Reliability of Automotive Painting Shop Robots

Article Preview

Abstract:

Robots in automotive assembly plant are crucial for automation of the plant. As the robots are expensive, they are the main contributor to plant investment. Thus, it is important for the robots to have high reliability. This paper presents the reliability analysis of robots at an automotive assembly plant. The analysis was based on operating hours and frequency of the failures of the robots. The data were acquired from plant maintenance data. Using seven years of failure data, the robots’ mean time between failures (MTBF) and reliability were evaluated. Constant failure rate was assumed in the analysis. From the analysis it is noted that the reliability of the robots at the plant varies from 15% to 62% and 2% to 39% for 10,000 hours and 20,000 hours respectively. These findings could assist the maintenance manager to schedule the maintenance and replacement of the robot at the plant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

516-520

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.S. Dhillon, O.C. Anude, Robot safety and reliability: a review, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1993, pp.413-29.

DOI: 10.1016/0026-2714(93)90030-3

Google Scholar

[2] S.P. Sharma, N. Sukavanom, N. Kumar, A. Kumar, Reliability analysis of complex multi-robotic system using Patri Nets and Fuzzy Lambda Tau methodology, Engineering Computations, 2010 Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.54-364.

DOI: 10.1108/02644401011029925

Google Scholar

[3] Panagiotis H. Tsarouhas and George K. Fourlas, Reliability Analysis of Mobile Robot: A Case Study, ISBN: 978-1-61804-226-2.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Starr, R. Wynne and I. Kennedy, Failure analysis of mature robots in automotive production, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers – Part B (J. Eng. Manuf. ) Vol 213, 1999, pp.813-824.

DOI: 10.1243/0954405991517245

Google Scholar

[5] George E. Dieter, Linda C. Schmidt, Engineering design, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill International Edition.

Google Scholar

[6] MIL-HDBK-338B, Electronic Reliability Design Handbook, Department of Defense, USA, (1998), pp.81-117.

Google Scholar