The Effect of Alkaline Concentration and Curing Temperature on the Durability of Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, fly ash was used to synthesize geopolymer mortar by using an activating solution prepared from a different concentration of NaOH and a highly viscous Na-silicate. The NaOH concentration prepared were 8M, 12M, and 14M. The prepared geopolymers were cured at different temperatures (ambient, 40°C, and 60°C) and were studied to determine their strength, bond structure, mechanical properties, and resistance in an acidic and salty environment using an accelerated durability test. FTIR results showed distinctive peaks of aluminosilicate bond structures. Maximum strength was achieved for 14M samples cured at room temperature. Higher alkalinity resulted in higher compressive and flexural strength and lower water absorption. Lower water absorption capacity and higher resistance to the extreme environment were achieved for samples cured at higher temperatures and higher molarities. The maximum mass loss was 10.9% for 8M cured at ambient temperature exposed to an acidic environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

95-107

Citation:

Online since:

June 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. B. Ali, R. Saidur, and M. S. Hossain, A review on emission analysis in cement industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (2011), 2252–2261.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014

Google Scholar

[2] A. Bouchikhi et al., Use of residual waste glass in an alkali-activated binder – Structural characterization, environmental leaching behavior and comparison of reactivity, Journal of Building Engineering, (2021),101903.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101903

Google Scholar

[3] F. Pacheco-Torgal, Z. Abdollahnejad, a. F. Camões, M. Jamshidi, and Y. Ding, Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? Construction and Building Materials,(2012), 400–405.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017

Google Scholar

[4] S. K. John, Y. Nadir, and K. Girija, Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: A review, Construction and Building Materials, (2021), 122443.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122443

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, T. Yang, L. Li, H. Zhu, and H. Wang, Conversion of local industrial wastes into greener cement through geopolymer technology : A case study of high-magnesium nickel slag, Journal of Cleaner Production, (2017), 463–471.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.147

Google Scholar

[6] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers: Ceramic-like inorganic polymers, Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology, (2017),335–350.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Xu and J. S. J. Van Deventer, The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals, International Journal of Mineral Processing, (2000), 247–266.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(99)00074-5

Google Scholar

[8] Prof. Dr. Joseph Davidovits, Environmentally Driven Geopolymer Cement Applications, Geopolymer Conference, (2002),1–9.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers based on natural and synthetic metakaolin a critical review, Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, (2018), 201–214.

DOI: 10.1002/9781119474746.ch19

Google Scholar

[10] L. Machiels, L. Arnout, P. T. Jones, B. Blanpain, and Y. Pontikes, Inorganic polymer cement from fe-silicate glasses: Varying the activating solution to glass ratio, Waste and Biomass Valorization, (2014), 411–428.

DOI: 10.1007/s12649-014-9296-5

Google Scholar

[11] P. Duxson, A. Fernández-Jiménez, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, A. Palomo, and J. S. J. Deventer, Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art, Journal of Materials Science, (2006), 2917–2933.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

Google Scholar

[12] İ. B. Topçu, M. U. Toprak, and T. Uygunoğlu, Durability and microstructure characteristics of alkali activated coal bottom ash geopolymer cement, Journal of Cleaner Production, (2014), 211–217.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.037

Google Scholar

[13] J. L. Provis and J. S. J. van Deventer, Geopolymers: structure, processing, properties and industrial applications. Boca raton Boston New York Washington, DC, (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] M. J. Moghadam, R. Ajalloeian, and A. Hajiannia, Preparation and application of alkali-activated materials based on waste glass and coal gangue: A review, Construction and Building Materials, (2019), 84–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.071

Google Scholar

[15] G. Görhan and G. Kürklü, The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures, Composites Part B: Engineering, (2014), 371–377.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082

Google Scholar

[16] F. Ameri, P. Shoaei, S. A. Zareei, and B. Behforouz, Geopolymers vs. alkali-activated materials (AAMs): A comparative study on durability, microstructure, and resistance to elevated temperatures of lightweight mortars, Construction and Building Materials, (2019), 49–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.079

Google Scholar

[17] K. Chen, D. Wu, L. Xia, Q. Cai, and Z. Zhang, Geopolymer concrete durability subjected to aggressive environments – A review of influence factors and comparison with ordinary Portland cement,, Construction and Building Materials, (2021), 122496.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122496

Google Scholar

[18] C. Medina, M. I. Sánchez De Rojas, and M. Frías, Freeze-thaw durability of recycled concrete containing ceramic aggregate, Journal of Cleaner Production, (2013), 151–160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.042

Google Scholar

[19] T. Bakharev, Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions,, Cement and Concrete Research, (2005), 1233–1246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002

Google Scholar

[20] T. Bakharev, Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack, Cement and Concrete Research, (2005), 658–670.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005

Google Scholar

[21] W. K. W. Lee and J. S. J. van Deventer, The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers,, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, (2002), 2–3.

DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(02)00239-x

Google Scholar

[22] H. Zhu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and L. Tian, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash concrete: Chloride penetration in pastes and mortars, Construction and Building Materials, (2014), 51–59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.110

Google Scholar

[23] B. J. Mathew, M. Sudhakar, and C. Natarajan, Development of Coal Ash – GGBS based geopolymer bricks, (2013),133–139.

Google Scholar

[24] Z. T. Yao et al., Earth-Science Reviews A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash, (2015), 105–121.

Google Scholar

[25] Davidovits, M. Davidovics, P. N. Balaguru, a Foden, U. Sorathia, and R. E. Lyon, Geopolymer Composites,, Composites, (1996).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(199703)21:2<67::aid-fam596>3.0.co;2-n

Google Scholar

[26] S. a. Bernal and J. L. Provis, Durability of alkali-activated materials: Progress and perspectives, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, (2014), 997–1008.

DOI: 10.1111/jace.12831

Google Scholar

[27] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers - Inorganic polymeric new materials, Journal of Thermal Analysis, (1991), 1633–1656.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01912193

Google Scholar

[28] A. W. Ourgessa, A. Aniley, A. G. Gudisa, I. Neme, and A. Bekele, Effect of Alkaline Concentration and Solid Liquid Ratio on the Acid Resistance of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar, American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, (2019), 80.

DOI: 10.11648/j.ajset.20190404.14

Google Scholar

[29] P. Chindaprasirt, C. Jaturapitakkul, W. Chalee, and U. Rattanasak, Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers, Waste Management, (2009), 539–543.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.023

Google Scholar

[30] V. F. F. Barbosa, K. J. D. MacKenzie, and C. Thaumaturgo, Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: Sodium polysialate polymers, International Journal of Inorganic Materials, (2000), 309–317.

DOI: 10.1016/s1466-6049(00)00041-6

Google Scholar

[31] D. Zaharaki, K. Komnitsas, and V. Perdikatsis, Use of analytical techniques for identification of inorganic polymer gel composition, Journal of Materials Science, (2010),2715–2724.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4257-2

Google Scholar

[32] M. Soutsos, A. P. Boyle, R. Vinai, A. Hadjierakleous, and S. J. Barnett, Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers, Construction and Building Materials, (2015), 355–368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.045

Google Scholar

[33] F. Skvara, L. Kopecky, J. Nemecek, and Z. Bittnar, Microstructure of geopolymer materials based on flyash, Ceramics-Silikaty, (2005), 208–215.

Google Scholar

[34] F. G. M. Aredes, T. M. B. Campos, J. P. B. Machado, K. K. Sakane, G. P. Thim, and D. D. Brunelli, Effect of cure temperature on the formation of metakaolinite-based geopolymer, Ceramics International, (2015),7302–7311.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.022

Google Scholar

[35] P. Nath and P. K. Sarker, Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete, Construction and Building Materials, (2016), 22–31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.034

Google Scholar

[36] M. Olivia and H. R. Nikraz, Strength and water penetrability of fly ash geopolymer concrete, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, (2011), 70–78.

Google Scholar

[37] S. Thokchom, P. Ghosh, and S. Ghosh, Effect of water absorption, porosity and sorptivity on durability of geopolymer mortars, (2009), 28–32.

Google Scholar

[38] J. S. J. van Deventer, J. L. Provis, and P. Duxson, Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement, Minerals Engineering, (2012), 89–104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009

Google Scholar